| Literature DB >> 31757219 |
Peter J Maughan1, Rebekah Lee2, Rachel Walstead3, Robert J Vickerstaff4, Melissa C Fogarty2, Cory R Brouwer3, Robert R Reid3, Jeremy J Jay3, Wubishet A Bekele5, Eric W Jackson6, Nicholas A Tinker5, Tim Langdon4, Jessica A Schlueter3, Eric N Jellen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cultivated hexaploid oat (Common oat; Avena sativa) has held a significant place within the global crop community for centuries; although its cultivation has decreased over the past century, its nutritional benefits have garnered increased interest for human consumption. We report the development of fully annotated, chromosome-scale assemblies for the extant progenitor species of the As- and Cp-subgenomes, Avena atlantica and Avena eriantha respectively. The diploid Avena species serve as important genetic resources for improving common oat's adaptive and food quality characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Avena; Aveninae; Crown rust resistance; Flowering time; Hi-C; Oat; Polyploidy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31757219 PMCID: PMC6874827 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-019-0712-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Summary statistics for the canu [33] and Hi-C assemblies for A. atlantica and A. eriantha
| Assembly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canu | Hi-C | Canu | Hi-C | |
| Number of scaffolds | 3941 | 2195 | 8067 | 2652 |
| Total size of scaffolds (bp) | 3,683,522,149 | 3,685,054,491 | 3,773,539,112 | 3,777,787,481 |
| Longest scaffold (bp) | 25,143,700 | 577,845,554 | 10,103,775 | 588,203,704 |
| Shortest scaffold (bp) | 1010 | 1010 | 1020 | 1020 |
| Number of scaffolds > 1 M nucleotides | 768 | 9 | 1203 | 7 |
| N50 scaffold length | 5,544,947 | 513,237,590 | 1,385,002 | 534,821,622 |
| L50 scaffold count | 196 | 4 | 797 | 4 |
| Scaffold % A | 27.81 | 27.81 | 28.06 | 28.04 |
| Scaffold % C | 22.2 | 22.19 | 21.94 | 21.91 |
| Scaffold % G | 22.19 | 22.18 | 21.93 | 21.91 |
| Scaffold % T | 27.8 | 27.79 | 28.07 | 28.05 |
| Scaffold % N | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.09 |
| Scaffold N nt | 0 | 1,250,201 | 0 | 3,223,400 |
| Scaffold % non-ACGTN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Percentage of assembly in scaffolded contigs | 0.00% | 97.00% | 0.00% | 97.80% |
| Average number of contigs per scaffold | 1 | 1.9 | 1 | 3.1 |
| Average length of breaks (20 or more Ns) between contigs | 0 | 601 | 0 | 578 |
| Number of contigs | 3941 | 4275 | 8067 | 8228 |
| Number of contigs in scaffolds | 0 | 2244 | 0 | 5740 |
| Number of contigs not in scaffolds | 3941 | 2031 | 8067 | 2488 |
| Total size of contigs | 3,683,522,149 | 3,683,804,291 | 3,773,539,112 | 3,774,564,081 |
| Longest contig | 25,143,700 | 21,736,085 | 10,103,775 | 10,106,525 |
| Shortest contig | 1010 | 120 | 1020 | 198 |
| Number of contigs > 1 M nt | 768 | 868 | 1203 | 1202 |
| N50 contig length | 5,544,947 | 4,310,367 | 1,385,002 | 1,314,218 |
| L50 contig count | 196 | 245 | 797 | 838 |
| Contig % A | 27.81 | 27.81 | 28.06 | 28.07 |
| Contig % C | 22.2 | 22.2 | 21.94 | 21.93 |
| Contig % G | 22.19 | 22.19 | 21.93 | 21.93 |
| Contig % T | 27.8 | 27.8 | 28.07 | 28.07 |
| Contig % N | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Contig %non-ACGTN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fig. 1Correlation between the physical and linkage map. The genetic position of mapped markers is plotted as a function of physical distance relative to the A. atlantica genome assembly. The linkage position of six unassigned scaffolds with multiple mapping markers is shown
Physical map and Linkage map assignment. Haplotag markers from the consensus map of Latta et al. [36] where used to assign scaffold assemblies to linkage groups. Two scaffolds mapped to LG 2 and were merged
| LG | Total markers | Miss-matches | % Miss-matches | % Matches | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 705 | 12 | 1.7% | 98.3% | ScoFOjO_1702_2338 | AA2 |
| 2A1 | 85 | 2 | 2.4% | 97.6% | ScoFOjO_1577 | AA5 |
| 2B1 | 378 | 10 | 2.6% | 97.4% | ScoFOjO_1310 | |
| 3 | 546 | 11 | 2.0% | 98.0% | ScoFOjO_2069_2732 | AA3 |
| 4 | 370 | 16 | 4.3% | 95.7% | ScoFOjO_2050_2712 | AA6 |
| 5 | 872 | 24 | 2.8% | 97.2% | ScoFOjO_350_483 | AA4 |
| 6 | 749 | 36 | 4.8% | 95.2% | ScoFOjO_1760_2399 | AA7 |
| 7 | 846 | 8 | 0.9% | 99.1% | ScoFOjO_324_449 | AA1 |
| Total: | 4551 | 119 | 2.7% | 97.3% | – | – |
1A = Markers spans 205.8 on the physical map corresponding to linkage positions 0–48 cM on the consensus linkage map; B = Markers spans 278.2 Mb on the physical map corresponding to linkage position 49–116 cM on the consensus linkage map
Fig. 2Genome overview of a A. atlantica and b A. eriantha. Track 1 (outside): Chromosome and sizes; Tracks 2: Annotated gene density; Track 3: Centromeric repeat density; Track 4: Telomeric sub-repeat density; Track 5: C-genome specific repeat (pAm1) density; Track 6: A-genome specific repeat (pAvKB26) density
Fig. 5Abbreviated maximum likelihood tree generated using a 10,894 SNPs for C-genome diploids rooted to the A. atlantica (AT_Cc7277) reference and b 7221 SNPs for A-genome diploids rooted to the A. eriantha reference (ER_CN 19238). Asterisks denote percentage of 1000 bootstrap replicates that support the topology at 90–100% (gold) and 75–89% (blue). Scale bar represents substitutions per site. Branch labels are based on subgenome composition and, in some cases, diaspore morphology (“floret-shattering,” “spikelet-shattering,” or “cultivated”). Unabbreviated trees are provided as Additional file 15: Figure S7 and Additional file 16: Figure S8
Ancestral subgenome groups (A-, C- and D-) designation for each of the 21 consensus linkages groups reported for A. sativa [29]. Haplotag markers mapping to (A) A. atlantica and (B) A. eriantha chromosomes, where highest haplotag mapping are colored red and transition to white as the number of haplotags mapping decreases
1Chromosomal designation as previously reported by Chaffin et al. [28] and Yan et al. [16]. Where assignments are split by a forward slash, the assignment given to the longest part of the chromosome is shown first
Chaffin designated Mrg11 as C/A, while Yan et al. designated it as C. Here we assign it as D/C
3Yan et al. [16] designated Mrg28 as D/C, while Chaffin et al. [28] designated it as C. Here we re-designate it as D/C
Fig. 3Identification of candidate genes putatively underlying heading date in oats. Candidate gene loci were identified using BLAST searches against the A. atlantica genome assembly using maker sequences associated with heading date QTLs located on the homoeologous linkage groups a Mrg12 and b Mrg02 (Bekele et al. [29]). Markers from both QTLs mapped to the same physical position on chromosome AA1, within an interval containing an FT-like protein (HD3A), suggesting that heading date in modern oat is controlled by two functional homoeologs of the flowering time gene
Fig. 4Identification of candidate genes putatively underlying crown rust resistance in oats. Candidate gene loci were identified using BLAST searches against the A. atlantica genome assembly using maker sequences associated with crown rust QTLs located on hexaploid A. sativa linkage group Mrg18 reported by Klos et al. [30]. Mrg18 was previously shown to be involved with an intergenomic translocation involving 7C and 17A, corresponding to A. eriantha chromosome AE7 (blue) and A. atlantica chromosome AA2 (red)