BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since the advent of molecular phylogenetics, numerous attempts have been made to infer the evolutionary trajectories of chromosome numbers on DNA phylogenies. Ideally, such inferences should be evaluated against cytogenetic data. Towards this goal, we carried out phylogenetic modelling of chromosome number change and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a medium sized genus of Araceae to elucidate if data from chromosomal markers would support maximum likelihood-inferred changes in chromosome numbers among close relatives. Typhonium, the focal genus, includes species with 2n = 65 and 2n = 8, the lowest known count in the family. METHODS: A phylogeny from nuclear and plastid sequences (96 taxa, 4252 nucleotides) and counts for all included species (15 of them first reported here) were used to model chromosome number evolution, assuming discrete events, such as polyploidization and descending or ascending dysploidy, occurring at different rates. FISH with three probes (5S rDNA, 45S rDNA and Arabidopsis-like telomeres) was performed on ten species with 2n = 8 to 2n = 24. KEY RESULTS: The best-fitting models assume numerous past chromosome number reductions. Of the species analysed with FISH, the two with the lowest chromosome numbers contained interstitial telomeric signals (Its), which together with the phylogeny and modelling indicates decreasing dysploidy as an explanation for the low numbers. A model-inferred polyploidization in another species is matched by an increase in rDNA sites. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a densely sampled phylogeny, ancestral state modelling and FISH revealed that the species with n = 4 is highly derived, with the FISH data pointing to a Robertsonian fusion-like chromosome rearrangement in the ancestor of this species.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since the advent of molecular phylogenetics, numerous attempts have been made to infer the evolutionary trajectories of chromosome numbers on DNA phylogenies. Ideally, such inferences should be evaluated against cytogenetic data. Towards this goal, we carried out phylogenetic modelling of chromosome number change and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a medium sized genus of Araceae to elucidate if data from chromosomal markers would support maximum likelihood-inferred changes in chromosome numbers among close relatives. Typhonium, the focal genus, includes species with 2n = 65 and 2n = 8, the lowest known count in the family. METHODS: A phylogeny from nuclear and plastid sequences (96 taxa, 4252 nucleotides) and counts for all included species (15 of them first reported here) were used to model chromosome number evolution, assuming discrete events, such as polyploidization and descending or ascending dysploidy, occurring at different rates. FISH with three probes (5S rDNA, 45S rDNA and Arabidopsis-like telomeres) was performed on ten species with 2n = 8 to 2n = 24. KEY RESULTS: The best-fitting models assume numerous past chromosome number reductions. Of the species analysed with FISH, the two with the lowest chromosome numbers contained interstitial telomeric signals (Its), which together with the phylogeny and modelling indicates decreasing dysploidy as an explanation for the low numbers. A model-inferred polyploidization in another species is matched by an increase in rDNA sites. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a densely sampled phylogeny, ancestral state modelling and FISH revealed that the species with n = 4 is highly derived, with the FISH data pointing to a Robertsonian fusion-like chromosome rearrangement in the ancestor of this species.
Authors: Tiago Ribeiro; Christopher E Buddenhagen; W Wayt Thomas; Gustavo Souza; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand Journal: Protoplasma Date: 2017-08-26 Impact factor: 3.356
Authors: Prabhu Shankar Lakshmanan; Katrijn Van Laere; Tom Eeckhaut; Johan Van Huylenbroeck; Erik Van Bockstaele; Ludmila Khrustaleva Journal: Comp Cytogenet Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 1.800
Authors: Ana Paula Moraes; André Olmos Simões; Dario Isidro Ojeda Alayon; Fábio de Barros; Eliana Regina Forni-Martins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anton Stepanenko; Guimin Chen; Phuong T N Hoang; Jörg Fuchs; Ingo Schubert; Nikolai Borisjuk Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Emanuelle Varão Vasconcelos; Santelmo Vasconcelos; Tiago Ribeiro; Ana Maria Benko-Iseppon; Ana Christina Brasileiro-Vidal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter J Maughan; Rebekah Lee; Rachel Walstead; Robert J Vickerstaff; Melissa C Fogarty; Cory R Brouwer; Robert R Reid; Jeremy J Jay; Wubishet A Bekele; Eric W Jackson; Nicholas A Tinker; Tim Langdon; Jessica A Schlueter; Eric N Jellen Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 7.431