Literature DB >> 31724822

Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Golan Amrani1, Amit Gefen1.   

Abstract

The use of an endotracheal tube (ETT), which is required for any mechanical ventilation procedure, involves an inherent risk for facial skin, lip, and mucosal pressure ulcers. The ETT is one of the most common devices associated with medical device-related pressure ulcers (MDRPUs) among surgical and intensive care unit patients. In the present work, we investigated, for the first time in the literature, the biomechanical effects of the presence and positioning of an ETT in the mouth on lip, mucosal and surrounding facial skin loads. Using two anatomically realistic finite element model variants, two ETT locations were simulated and compared, at the centre versus the corner of the mouth. Our study shows that a central location of the ETT inflicted greater lip and mucosal stress values, but a corner location caused a more widespread and diffused lip, mucosal and facial skin stress exposure. Accordingly, we cannot recommend a "safer" location for ETTs in the mouth; additional preventative measures such as dedicated dressing materials or special cushioning pads applied prophylactically, should be developed to protect from MDRPUs associated with ETT usage. The present modelling framework can be used to study the biomechanical efficacy of such protective technologies, and can therefore aid in the prevention of ETT-caused MDRPUs.
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endotracheal tube; finite element modelling; medical device-related pressure ulcer; pressure injury

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31724822      PMCID: PMC7948655          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  34 in total

1.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Effects of humidity on skin friction against medical textiles as related to prevention of pressure injuries.

Authors:  Danit Schwartz; Yana Katsman Magen; Ayelet Levy; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Use of wound dressings to enhance prevention of pressure ulcers caused by medical devices.

Authors:  Joyce Black; Paulo Alves; Christopher Tod Brindle; Carol Dealey; Nick Santamaria; Evan Call; Michael Clark
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Oral mucosa pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients: A preliminary observational study of incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Chul-Hoon Kim; Myoung Soo Kim; Myung Ja Kang; Hyun Hee Kim; Nam Jung Park; Hyun Kyeong Jung
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.932

5.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non-offloaded sacral pressure ulcer.

Authors:  Dafna Schwartz; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Zehava Ovadia-Blechman; Oshrit Hoffer; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Comparison of two endotracheal tube securement techniques on unplanned extubation, oral mucosa, and facial skin integrity.

Authors:  S Barnason; J Graham; M C Wild; L B Jensen; D Rasmussen; P Schulz; S Woods; B Carder
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.210

9.  The contribution of a directional preference of stiffness to the efficacy of prophylactic sacral dressings in protecting healthy and diabetic tissues from pressure injury: computational modelling studies.

Authors:  Ayelet Levy; Dafna Schwartz; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Evaluation of helmet and goggle designs by modeling non-penetrating projectile impacts.

Authors:  Rinat Friedman; Ayelet Haimy; Yoram Epstein; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 1.763

View more
  6 in total

1.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The mechanobiology theory of the development of medical device-related pressure ulcers revealed through a cell-scale computational modeling framework.

Authors:  Adi Lustig; Raz Margi; Aleksei Orlov; Daria Orlova; Liran Azaria; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-02-19

3.  Evaluation of facial tissue stresses under medical devices post application of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant: An integrated experimental-computational study.

Authors:  Raz Margi; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Effect of Algoplaque Hydrocolloid Dressing Combined with Nanosilver Antibacterial Gel under Predictive Nursing in the Treatment of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury.

Authors:  Chunxiu Li; Hongmei Chen; Guanghui You
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Our contemporary understanding of the aetiology of pressure ulcers/pressure injuries.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; David M Brienza; Janet Cuddigan; Emily Haesler; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  What makes a hydrogel-based dressing advantageous for the prevention of medical device-related pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.