Literature DB >> 9835671

Comparison of two endotracheal tube securement techniques on unplanned extubation, oral mucosa, and facial skin integrity.

S Barnason1, J Graham, M C Wild, L B Jensen, D Rasmussen, P Schulz, S Woods, B Carder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 2 standard methods (i.e., twill tape versus adhesive tape) of securement on unplanned extubation, oral mucosa, and facial skin integrity of the orally intubated patient.
DESIGN: A prospective, quasi-experimental design was used for the pilot study.
SETTING: The setting for the pilot study included critical care units of 3 community hospitals and 1 veterans' hospital in a midwestern city.
SUBJECTS: A total of 52 orally intubated adult subjects were enrolled in the study from the 4 clinical sites over a 6-month period of time. The participants in the study consisted of 30 men and 22 women. The subjects ranged in age from 22 to 85 years, with a mean age of 62.3 years. The mean length of intubation was 89.6 hours. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures of the study were (1) unplanned extubation, (2) oral mucosa status, and (3) facial skin integrity.
INTERVENTIONS: Endotracheal tube securement with either the twill tape or the adhesive tape securement method.
RESULTS: With use of multiple analysis of variances (MANOVA) and repeated analyses of variances (ANOVAs), there were no significant differences by time or type of endotracheal tube securement method on oral mucosa or facial skin integrity. A chi-square analysis demonstrated no significant association between the 2 types of endotracheal tube securement when comparing their efficacy in preventing unplanned extubation.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot study demonstrated both methods of endotracheal tube securement to be comparable in preventing unplanned extubation and in maintaining oral mucosa status and facial skin integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9835671     DOI: 10.1016/s0147-9563(98)90087-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  7 in total

1.  The role of the endotracheal tube cuff in microaspiration.

Authors:  V Anne Hamilton; Mary Jo Grap
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Two Different Endotracheal Tube Securing Techniques: Fixing Bandage vs. Adhesive Tape.

Authors:  Javad Seyedhosseini; Mojtaba Ahmadi; Amir Nejati; Ali Ardalan; Mohammadhossein Ghafari; Elnaz Vahidi
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-13

4.  The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes.

Authors:  Paris B Lovett; Alexander Flaxman; Kai M Stürmann; Polly Bijur
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2006-05-24

5.  A novel technique for securing supra-glottic airway device to prevent mal-positioning.

Authors:  Arindam Chatterjee; Ashish Kumar Kannaujia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07

6.  The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Janna S Landsperger; Jesse M Byram; Bradley D Lloyd; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Unplanned Extubation in Patients with Mechanical Ventilation: Experience in the Medical Intensive Care Unit of a Single Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Tae Won Lee; Jeong Woo Hong; Jung-Wan Yoo; Sunmi Ju; Seung Hun Lee; Seung Jun Lee; Yu Ji Cho; Yi Yeong Jeong; Jong Deog Lee; Ho Cheol Kim
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2015-10-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.