Literature DB >> 29797409

Effects of humidity on skin friction against medical textiles as related to prevention of pressure injuries.

Danit Schwartz1, Yana Katsman Magen1, Ayelet Levy1, Amit Gefen1.   

Abstract

Sustained pressure, shear forces, and friction, as well as elevated humidity/moisture, are decisive physical factors in the development of pressure injuries (PIs). To date, further research is needed in order to understand the influence of humidity and moisture on the coefficient of friction (COF) of skin against different types of medical textiles. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of moisture caused by sweat, urine, or saline on the resulting COF of skin against different textiles used in the medical setting in the context of PI prevention. For that purpose, we performed physical measurements of static COFs of porcine skin followed by finite element (FE) computational modelling in order to illustrate the effect of increased COF at the skin on the resulting strains and stresses deep within the soft tissues of the buttocks. The COF of dry skin obtained for the 3 textiles varied between 0.59 (adult diaper) and 0.91 (polyurethane dressing). In addition, the COF increased with the added moisture in all of the tested cases. The results of the FE simulations further showed that increased COF results in elevated strain energy density and shear strain values in the skin and deeper tissues and, hence, in an increased risk for PI development. We conclude that moisture may accelerate PI formation by increasing the COF between the skin and the medical textile, regardless of the type of the liquid that is present. Hence, reduction of the wetness/moisture between the skin and fabrics in patients at a high risk of developing PIs is a key measure in PI prevention.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational modelling; finite element analysis; pressure injuries; skin friction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29797409      PMCID: PMC7949509          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  36 in total

1.  Friction coefficient of skin in real-time.

Authors:  Raja K Sivamani; Jack Goodman; Norm V Gitis; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  How do microclimate factors affect the risk for superficial pressure ulcers: a mathematical modeling study.

Authors:  Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.932

3.  Simultaneous determination of the nonlinear-elastic properties of skin and subcutaneous tissue in unconfined compression tests.

Authors:  John Z Wu; Robert G Cutlip; Michael E Andrew; Ren G Dong
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Simulations of skin and subcutaneous tissue loading in the buttocks while regaining weight-bearing after a push-up in wheelchair users.

Authors:  Ayelet Levy; Kara Kopplin; Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-04-30

5.  Frictional properties of skin: proposal of a new approach.

Authors:  A A Koudine; M Barquins; P H Anthoine; L Aubert; J L Lévêque
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.970

6.  An air-cell-based cushion for pressure ulcer protection remarkably reduces tissue stresses in the seated buttocks with respect to foams: finite element studies.

Authors:  Ayelet Levy; Kara Kopplin; Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.932

7.  In vivo dynamic optical coherence elastography using a ring actuator.

Authors:  Brendan F Kennedy; Timothy R Hillman; Robert A McLaughlin; Bryden C Quirk; David D Sampson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  An investigation of human palmar skin friction and the effects of materials, pinch force and moisture.

Authors:  B Buchholz; L J Frederick; T J Armstrong
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  The biomechanics of heel ulcers.

Authors:  Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.932

10.  The decubitus ulcer: facts and controversies.

Authors:  Caren Campbell; Lawrence Charles Parish
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.541

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of humidity on skin friction against medical textiles as related to prevention of pressure injuries.

Authors:  Danit Schwartz; Yana Katsman Magen; Ayelet Levy; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Maja Krämer; Maik Brehm; Sören Burckardt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Pressure ulcer Cat. II-IV incidence on the CuroCell S.A.M. PRO powered reactive air support surface in a high-risk population: A multicentre cohort study in 12 Belgian nursing homes.

Authors:  Elien Zwaenepoel; Ann Van Hecke; Bénédicte Manderlier; Sofie Verhaeghe; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  The bioengineering theory of the key modes of action of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant.

Authors:  Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Re: The preventive effect of hydrocolloid dressing to prevent facial pressure and facial marks during use of medical protective equipment in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  T P Guna; P Rilna
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lea Peko; Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Safety Assessment of Rehabilitation Robots: A Review Identifying Safety Skills and Current Knowledge Gaps.

Authors:  Jule Bessler; Gerdienke B Prange-Lasonder; Leendert Schaake; José F Saenz; Catherine Bidard; Irene Fassi; Marcello Valori; Aske Bach Lassen; Jaap H Buurke
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-03-22

9.  Effect of Hospital Linens on Unit-Acquired Pressure Injuries for Adults in Medical ICUs: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mary Montague-McCown; James Bena; Christian N Burchill
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-02-24

10.  The preventive effect of hydrocolloid dressing to prevent facial pressure and facial marks during use of medical protective equipment in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  J L Del Castillo Pardo de Vera; S Reina Alcalde; J L Cebrian Carretero; M Burgueño García
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 1.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.