Literature DB >> 28960851

The contribution of a directional preference of stiffness to the efficacy of prophylactic sacral dressings in protecting healthy and diabetic tissues from pressure injury: computational modelling studies.

Ayelet Levy1, Dafna Schwartz1, Amit Gefen1.   

Abstract

The sacral region is the most common site for pressure injuries (PIs) associated with lying in bed, and such sacral PIs often commence as deep tissue injuries (DTIs) that later present as open wounds. In complex patients, diabetes is common. Because, among other factors, diabetes affects connective tissue stiffness properties, making these tissues less able to dissipate mechanical loads through physiological deformations, diabetes is an additional biomechanical risk factor for PIs and DTIs. A preventive measure with established successful clinical outcomes is the use of sacral prophylactic dressings. The objective of this study has been to expand our previous work regarding the modes of action and biomechanical efficacy of prophylactic dressings in protecting the soft tissues adjacent to the sacrum by specifically examining the role of a directional stiffness preference (anisotropy) of the dressing while further accounting for diabetic tissue conditions. Multiple three-dimensional anatomically detailed finite element (FE) model variants representing diabetic tissue conditions were used, and tissue loading state data were compared with healthy tissue simulations. We specifically compared soft tissue exposures to elevated internal shear stresses and strain energy densities (SED) near the sacrum during supine weight bearing on a standard (foam) hospital mattress without a dressing, with a prophylactic dressing lacking directional stiffness preferences and with an anisotropic dressing. Our results have clearly shown that an anisotropic dressing design reduces the peak tissue stresses and exposure to sustained tissue deformations in both healthy and diabetic cases. The present study provides additional important insights regarding the optimal structural and material design of prophylactic dressings, which in turn, informs clinicians and decision makers regarding beneficial features.
© 2017 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modelling; Deep tissue injuries; Finite element analysis; Prophylactic dressings; Sacral pressure injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28960851      PMCID: PMC7949596          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  19 in total

1.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Assessment of mechanical conditions in sub-dermal tissues during sitting: a combined experimental-MRI and finite element approach.

Authors:  Eran Linder-Ganz; Noga Shabshin; Yacov Itzchak; Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Stress relaxation of porcine gluteus muscle subjected to sudden transverse deformation as related to pressure sore modeling.

Authors:  Avital Palevski; Ittai Glaich; Sigal Portnoy; Eran Linder-Ganz; Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Viscoelastic properties of ovine adipose tissue covering the gluteus muscles.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Einat Haberman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Enhancing pressure ulcer prevention using wound dressings: what are the modes of action?

Authors:  Evan Call; Justin Pedersen; Brian Bill; Joyce Black; Paulo Alves; C Tod Brindle; Carol Dealey; Nick Santamaria; Michael Clark
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Marie Gerdtz; Sarah Sage; Jane McCann; Amy Freeman; Theresa Vassiliou; Stephanie De Vincentis; Ai Wei Ng; Elizabeth Manias; Wei Liu; Jonathan Knott
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Preventing pressure ulcers: the goal is zero.

Authors:  Kathy D Duncan
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-10

8.  Biomechanical changes in connective tissues induced by experimental diabetes.

Authors:  T T Andreassen; K Seyer-Hansen; H Oxlund
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Copenh)       Date:  1981-11

9.  Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: Border II Trial.

Authors:  N Santamaria; M Gerdtz; W Liu; S Rakis; S Sage; A W Ng; H Tudor; J McCann; T Vassiliou; F Morrow; K Smith; J Knott; D Liew
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.072

10.  Diabetes alters mechanical properties and collagen fiber re-alignment in multiple mouse tendons.

Authors:  Brianne K Connizzo; Pankti R Bhatt; Kenneth W Liechty; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  10 in total

1.  Critical biomechanical and clinical insights concerning tissue protection when positioning patients in the operating room: A scoping review.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Sue Creehan; Joyce Black
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Maja Krämer; Maik Brehm; Sören Burckardt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Sodium pyruvate pre-treatment prevents cell death due to localised, damaging mechanical strains in the context of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Martha B Alvarez-Elizondo; Tamar Barenholz-Cohen; Daphne Weihs
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non-offloaded sacral pressure ulcer.

Authors:  Dafna Schwartz; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Zehava Ovadia-Blechman; Oshrit Hoffer; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Release of sodium pyruvate from sacral prophylactic dressings: A computational model.

Authors:  Ayelet Levy; Jan Kottner; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lea Peko; Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Evaluation of facial tissue stresses under medical devices post application of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant: An integrated experimental-computational study.

Authors:  Raz Margi; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  How patient migration in bed affects the sacral soft tissue loading and thereby the risk for a hospital-acquired pressure injury.

Authors:  Maayan Lustig; Neal Wiggermann; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.