Literature DB >> 30838792

Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.

Lea Peko Cohen1, Zehava Ovadia-Blechman2, Oshrit Hoffer2, Amit Gefen1.   

Abstract

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) masks are commonly used for respiratory support where intubation or a surgical procedure can be avoided. However, prolonged use of NIV masks involves risk to facial tissues, which are subjected to sustained deformations caused by tightening of the mask and microclimate conditions. The risk of developing such medical device-related pressure ulcers can be reduced by providing additional cushioning at the mask-face interface. In this work, we determined differences in facial tissue stresses while using an NIV mask with versus without using dressing cuts (Mepilex Lite; Mölnlycke Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden). First, we developed a force measurement system that was used to experimentally determine local forces applied to skin at the bridge of the nose, cheeks, and chin in a healthy sample group while using a NIV mask. We further demonstrated facial temperature distributions after use of the mask using infrared thermography. Next, using the finite element method, we delivered the measured compressive forces per site of the face in the model and compared maximal effective stresses in facial tissues with versus without the dressing cuts. The dressings have shown substantial biomechanical effectiveness in alleviating facial tissues deformations and stresses by providing localised cushioning to the tissues at risk.
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  finite element modelling; medical device-related pressure ulcer; non-invasive ventilation; pressure injury; prophylactic dressings

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838792      PMCID: PMC7948591          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  63 in total

1.  Nasal versus full face mask for noninvasive ventilation in chronic respiratory failure.

Authors:  G N Willson; A J Piper; M Norman; W G Chaseling; M A Milross; E R Collins; R R Grunstein
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  The response of peripheral microcirculation to gravity-induced changes.

Authors:  Zehava Ovadia-Blechman; Ashley Gritzman; Maya Shuvi; Benjamin Gavish; Vered Aharonson; Neta Rabin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Evaluation of patient skin breakdown and comfort with a new face mask for non-invasive ventilation: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Cesare Gregoretti; Marco Confalonieri; Paolo Navalesi; Vincenzo Squadrone; Pamela Frigerio; Fabio Beltrame; Giorgio Carbone; Giorgio Conti; Federica Gamna; Stefano Nava; Edoardo Calderini; Yoanna Skrobik; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Development of Personalized Fitting Device With 3-Dimensional Solution for Prevention of NIV Oronasal Mask-Related Pressure Ulcers.

Authors:  Maiko Shikama; Gojiro Nakagami; Hiroshi Noguchi; Taketoshi Mori; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.258

5.  Early use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute lung injury: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qingyuan Zhan; Bing Sun; Lirong Liang; Xixin Yan; Lutao Zhang; Jingping Yang; Ling Wang; Zhuang Ma; Liang Shi; Luqing Wei; Guoqiang Li; Lan Yang; Zhihong Shi; Yuqing Chen; Qixia Xu; Wei Li; Xi Zhu; Zongyu Wang; Yongchang Sun; Jie Zhuo; Yang Liu; Xuesong Li; Chen Wang
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Five-Layered Soft Silicone Foam Dressing to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Peggy Kalowes; Valerie Messina; Melanie Li
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Infrared thermal imaging for detection of peripheral vascular disorders.

Authors:  S Bagavathiappan; T Saravanan; John Philip; T Jayakumar; Baldev Raj; R Karunanithi; T M R Panicker; M Paul Korath; K Jagadeesan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-01

8.  A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Marie Gerdtz; Sarah Sage; Jane McCann; Amy Freeman; Theresa Vassiliou; Stephanie De Vincentis; Ai Wei Ng; Elizabeth Manias; Wei Liu; Jonathan Knott
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: Border II Trial.

Authors:  N Santamaria; M Gerdtz; W Liu; S Rakis; S Sage; A W Ng; H Tudor; J McCann; T Vassiliou; F Morrow; K Smith; J Knott; D Liew
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.072

10.  Use of Tekscan K-scan sensors for retropatellar pressure measurement avoiding errors during implantation and the effects of shear forces on the measurement precision.

Authors:  A Wilharm; Ch Hurschler; T Dermitas; M Bohnsack
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  11 in total

1.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Modelling an adult human head on a donut-shaped gel head support for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Rona Katzengold; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Zehava Ovadia-Blechman; Oshrit Hoffer; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The biomechanical efficacy of a hydrogel-based dressing in preventing facial medical device-related pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.099

5.  Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lea Peko; Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  The mechanobiology theory of the development of medical device-related pressure ulcers revealed through a cell-scale computational modeling framework.

Authors:  Adi Lustig; Raz Margi; Aleksei Orlov; Daria Orlova; Liran Azaria; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-02-19

7.  Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19.

Authors:  Nkemjika Abiakam; Peter Worsley; Hemalatha Jayabal; Kay Mitchell; Michaela Jones; Jacqui Fletcher; Fran Spratt; Dan Bader
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.099

8.  Evaluation of facial tissue stresses under medical devices post application of a cyanoacrylate liquid skin protectant: An integrated experimental-computational study.

Authors:  Raz Margi; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Preventing facial pressure injuries among health care staff working in diverse COVID-19 care environments.

Authors:  Zena Moore; David Moore; Natalie L McEvoy; Pinar Avsar; Tom O'Connor; Aglecia Budri; Gerard Curley; Simone Walsh; Frank Burke; Alison Porter-Armstrong; Wendy Chaboyer; John Rice; Declan Patton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.099

10.  What makes a hydrogel-based dressing advantageous for the prevention of medical device-related pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.