Literature DB >> 30596531

Evaluation of helmet and goggle designs by modeling non-penetrating projectile impacts.

Rinat Friedman1, Ayelet Haimy1, Yoram Epstein2, Amit Gefen1.   

Abstract

Despite the progress in developing personal combat-protective gear, eye and brain injuries are still widely common and carry fatal or long-term repercussions. The complex nature of the cranial tissues suggests that simple methods (e.g. crash-dummies) for testing the effectiveness of personal protective gear against non-penetrating impacts are both expensive and ineffective, and there are ethical issues in using animal or cadavers. The present work presents a versatile testing framework for quantitatively evaluating protective performances of head and eye combat-protective gear, against non-penetrating impacts. The biomimetic finite element (FE) head model that was developed provides realistic representation of cranial structure and tissue properties. Simulated crash impact results were validated against a former cadaveric study and by using a crash-phantom developed in our lab. The model was then fitted with various helmet and goggle designs onto which a non-penetrating ballistic impact was applied. Example data show that reduction of the elastic and shear moduli by 30% and 80% respectively of the helmet outer Kevlar-29 layer, lowered intracranial pressures by 20%. Our modeling suggests that the level of stresses that develop in brain tissues, which ultimately cause the brain damage, cannot be predicted solely by the properties of the helmet/goggle materials. We further found that a reduced contact area between goggles and face is a key factor in reducing the mechanical loads transmitted to the optic nerve and eye balls following an impact. Overall, this work demonstrates the simplicity, flexibility and usefulness for development, evaluation, and testing of combat-protective equipment using computational modeling. Highlights A finite element head model was developed for testing head gear. Reduced helmet's outer layer elastic and shear moduli lowered intracranial stresses. Gear material properties could not fully predict impact-related stress in the brain. Reduced goggles-face contact lowered transmitted loads to the optic nerve and eyes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element modelling; combat helmet; goggles; ocular trauma; traumatic brain injury simulations

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30596531     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1549238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  4 in total

1.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The biomechanical efficacy of a hydrogel-based dressing in preventing facial medical device-related pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Fluid Handling Dynamics and Durability of Silver-Containing Gelling Fiber Dressings Tested in a Robotic Wound System.

Authors:  Aleksei Orlov; Adi Lustig; Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Our contemporary understanding of the aetiology of pressure ulcers/pressure injuries.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; David M Brienza; Janet Cuddigan; Emily Haesler; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.