| Literature DB >> 31540470 |
Tracey L Livingstone1,2, Gemma Beasy3, Robert D Mills4, Jenny Plumb5, Paul W Needs6, Richard Mithen7,8, Maria H Traka9.
Abstract
Prostate cancer has become the most common form of non-cutaneous (internal) malignancy in men, accounting for 26% of all new male visceral cancer cases in the UK. The aetiology and pathogenesis of prostate cancer are not understood, but given the age-adjusted geographical variations in prostate cancer incidence quoted in epidemiological studies, there is increasing interest in nutrition as a relevant factor. In particular, foods rich in phytochemicals have been proposed to reduce the risk of prostate cancer. Epidemiological studies have reported evidence that plant-based foods including cruciferous vegetables, garlic, tomatoes, pomegranate and green tea are associated with a significant reduction in the progression of prostate cancer. However, while there is well-documented mechanistic evidence at a cellular level of the manner by which individual dietary components may reduce the risk of prostate cancer or its progression, evidence from intervention studies is limited. Moreover, clinical trials investigating the link between the dietary bioactives found in these foods and prostate cancer have reported varied conclusions. Herein, we review the plant bioactives for which there is substantial evidence from epidemiological and human intervention studies. The aim of this review is to provide important insights into how particular plant bioactives (e.g., sulphur-containing compounds, carotenoids and polyphenols) present in commonly consumed food groups may influence the development and progression of prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: bioactives; nutrition; phytochemicals; prostate cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31540470 PMCID: PMC6769996 DOI: 10.3390/nu11092245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Metabolism of glucoraphanin. Sulforaphane is absorbed readily into the enterocyte and conjugated with glutathione via the GSTM1 enzyme. Sulforaphane is then either metabolised and excreted in the urine via the mercapturic acid pathway or cleaved from glutathione into free sulforaphane [25].
Figure 2Metabolism of organosulfur compounds in garlic. Schematic outlining the breakdown of the S-alk(en)yl-L-cysteine sulfoxide (SACSO) alliin initially by alliinase, to thiosulfinates, and further compounds including sulfides [38,39,46].
Figure 3S-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide (SMCSO) metabolism. Schematic outlining the breakdown of SMCSO initially by specific cysteine conjugate β lyases leading to secondary bioactive products through dimerization and disproportionation reactions. Highlighted in red are the sulfur-containing metabolites with potential undetermined biological activity [57].
Figure 4Chemical structure of lycopene.
Figure 5Digestion and absorption of lycopene in the small intestine. Lycopene is absorbed into the enterocyte in lipid micelles and transported in the lymph in chylomicrons to the liver prior to transportation in plasma to target organs [65].
Figure 6Isomeric forms of resveratrol: trans- (left) and cis- (right).
Figure 7Chemical structure of major green tea catechins. (A) Epicatechin (EC); (B) Epigallocatechin (EGC); (C) Epicatechin 3-gallate (ECG); (D) Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG).
Figure 8Chemical structure of curcumin.
Figure 9Metabolism of ellagitannin within pomegranate. Briefly, ellagitannins such as punicalagin are metabolised by intestinal pH and/or gut microbiota (GM) to give ellagic acid, which is further broken down by gut microbiota to give various urolithins, including urolithin A, which is biologically relevant [135].
Summarised epidemiological and human studies for the dietary bioactives discussed. ADT: androgen deprivation treatment; PCa: prostate cancer; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; SFN: sulforaphane; ITC: isothiocyanate; FFQ: food frequency questionnaire
| Author, Year | Study Type | Patient Cohort/Intervention | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Liu et al. 2012 [ | Meta-analysis | 10 studies USA/Canada, 1 Asia, 2 Europe. | RR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.85–0.96 for overall cruciferous vegetable intake |
| Richman et al. 2012 [ | Prospective study | USA PCa registry. Biopsy-verified localised PCa. Clinical survey and FFQ at baseline and every 6 months | 59% reduced risk of PCa progression for highest vs. lowest intake of cruciferous vegetables. HR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.22–0.76 ( |
| Zhang et al. 2019 [ | 2-arm parallel randomised double-blinded intervention trial | USA cohort. Intervention for 4-6 weeks prior to prostate biopsy procedure | Accumulation of urine and plasma SFN ITCs and individual SFN metabolites. |
| Traka et al. 2019 [ | 3-arm parallel randomised double-blinded 12-month intervention trial | UK cohort. Prostate biopsies at the start and end of 12-month intervention | Dose-dependent attenuation of gene expression and associated oncogenic pathways |
|
| |||
| Hsing et al. 2002 [ | Population based study | Shanghai, China. | Highest allium intake (>10.0 g/day) OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76 |
| Zhou et al. 2013 [ | Systematic literature review | 3 studies Europe, 3 studies USA, 2 studies Asia, 1 Australia. Interview or self-administered FFQ | OR = 0.82 95% CI 0.70–0.97 for allium intake |
|
| |||
| Rowles et al. 2017 [ | Systematic literature review | 32 studies N. America, 6 Europe, 2 Australia, 2 Asia (China and Singapore), 1 S. America. | RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78−0.98, |
| Wang et al. 2015 [ | Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis | 22 studies N. America, 7 studies Europe, 2 Australia, 2 Asia, 1 S. America | RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.98 (localised PCa risk) |
| Van Hoang et al. 2018 [ | Case-control study | Vietnamese cohort. | OR = 0.46 95% CI 0.27–0.77 for highest lycopene intake |
| Key et al. 2015 [ | Pooled Analysis of 15 studies | 6 studies Europe, 6 studies US, 1 study Afro-Caribbean, 1 Australia, 1 Mixed-cohort (Australia and Europe) | No association between intake and overall risk of PCa. |
| Giovannucci et al. 2002 [ | Prospective Study | US male health professional cohort – ‘Health Professionals Follow-Up Study’ (HPFS) | RR = 0.84 CI 0.73–0.96 |
| Kim et al. 2003 [ | Double-blinded 2-arm randomised control trial | US cohort. Tomato sauce intervention vs. no intervention for 3 weeks prior to prostatectomy | Increased abundance of apoptotic cells (from 0.84 +/- 0.13% to 2.76 +/- 0.58% |
|
| |||
| Vartolomei et al. 2018 [ | Meta-analysis 17 studies | 4 studies Canada, 4 studies Europe, 4 studies USA, 2 studies Australia | No increased risk of PCa 0.98 95% CI 0.92–1.05, |
|
| |||
| Guo et al. 2017 [ | Systematic review and meta-analysis: | 6 studies Asia (incl. 1 Singapore, 4 Japan, 1 China), 2 Europe, 1 N. America, 1 Africa | RR 0.75 95% CI 0.53–1.07 for highest versus lowest category of green tea intake |
|
| |||
| Choi et al. 2019 [ | Randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial | S. Korean cohort. | PSA progression: 10.3% (treatment) vs 30.2% (control) |
| Hejazi et al. 2016 [ | Randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial | Iranian cohort. | Increase in plasma total antioxidant capacity (TAC) significantly higher in the treatment arm ( |
|
| |||
| Pantuck et al. 2006 [ | Phase II two-stage clinical trial | US cohort. PSA 0.2–5ng/mL documented as rising. 8 ounces of pomegranate juice daily (570 mg total polyphenol gallic acid) until disease progression | Increase in mean PSA doubling time significantly increased with treatment: |
| Paller et al. 2013 [ | Randomised phase II study | US cohort (multi-centre). Rising PSA without evidence of metastasis. 1g vs. 3g pomegranate extract capsules daily for up to 18 months. | Increase in PSA doubling time with treatment: |
| Stenner-Liewen et al. 2013 [ | Randomised placebo-controlled trial | Swiss cohort. PCa with PSA 5ng/mL. 500mL pomegranate juice vs. placebo beverage daily for 4 weeks, then all 250mL POM juice for 4 weeks. PSA measured at defined timepoints. | No significant difference in PSA levels at 28 days ( |
| Freedland et al. 2013 [ | Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. | US cohort. Pomegranate extract capsules or placebo for up to 4 weeks prior to prostatectomy | Urolithin A accumulation ( |
Figure 10Potential mechanisms of dietary plant bioactives and the prevention of prostate cancer. Briefly, dietary plant bioactives have been associated with a reduction in prostate cancer incidence and progression through a variety of different mechanisms. These include antioxidant properties, pro-apoptosis, anti-inflammatory pathways, metabolic regulation and cell cycle arrest. Direct exposure of these bioactive compounds may occur secondary to urinary reflux via the urethral ductal system [154]. Abbreviations are as follows: ACC1: acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1; Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma 2; Bcl-xL: B-cell lymphoma-extra-large; CPT1A: carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; ERK1/2: extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2; FA: fatty acid; FASN: fatty acid synthase; FKHRL1: FOXO transcription factor; HDAC: histone deacetylase; IGF: insulin-like growth factor; NF-κB: nuclear factor-kappa B; Nrf-2: nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; TRAIL: TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand.