BACKGROUND: Pomegranate juice has been associated with PSA doubling time (PSADT) elongation in a single-arm phase II trial. This study assesses biological activity of two doses of pomegranate extract (POMx) in men with recurrent prostate cancer, using changes in PSADT as the primary outcome. METHODS: This randomized, multi-center, double-blind phase II, dose-exploring trial randomized men with a rising PSA and without metastases to receive 1 or 3 g of POMx, stratified by baseline PSADT and Gleason score. Patients (104) were enrolled and treated for up to 18 months. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 96% white, with median age 74.5 years and median Gleason score 7. This study was designed to detect a 6-month on-study increase in PSADT from baseline in each arm. RESULTS:Overall, median PSADT in the ITT population lengthened from 11.9 months at baseline to 18.5 months after treatment (P < 0.001). PSADT lengthened in the low-dose group from 11.9 to 18.8 months and 12.2 to 17.5 months in the high-dose group, with no significant difference between dose groups (P = 0.554). PSADT increases >100% of baseline were observed in 43% of patients. Declining PSA levels were observed in 13 patients (13%). In all, 42% of patients discontinued treatment before meeting the protocol-definition of PSA progression, or 18 months, primarily due to a rising PSA. No significant changes occurred in testosterone. Although no clinically significant toxicities were seen, diarrhea was seen in 1.9% and 13.5% of patients in the 1- and 3-g dose groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: POMx treatment was associated with ≥ 6 month increases in PSADT in both treatment arms without adverse effects. The significance of this on-study slowing of PSADT remains unclear, reinforcing the need for placebo-controlled studies in this patient population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Pomegranate juice has been associated with PSA doubling time (PSADT) elongation in a single-arm phase II trial. This study assesses biological activity of two doses of pomegranate extract (POMx) in men with recurrent prostate cancer, using changes in PSADT as the primary outcome. METHODS: This randomized, multi-center, double-blind phase II, dose-exploring trial randomized men with a rising PSA and without metastases to receive 1 or 3 g of POMx, stratified by baseline PSADT and Gleason score. Patients (104) were enrolled and treated for up to 18 months. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 96% white, with median age 74.5 years and median Gleason score 7. This study was designed to detect a 6-month on-study increase in PSADT from baseline in each arm. RESULTS: Overall, median PSADT in the ITT population lengthened from 11.9 months at baseline to 18.5 months after treatment (P < 0.001). PSADT lengthened in the low-dose group from 11.9 to 18.8 months and 12.2 to 17.5 months in the high-dose group, with no significant difference between dose groups (P = 0.554). PSADT increases >100% of baseline were observed in 43% of patients. Declining PSA levels were observed in 13 patients (13%). In all, 42% of patients discontinued treatment before meeting the protocol-definition of PSA progression, or 18 months, primarily due to a rising PSA. No significant changes occurred in testosterone. Although no clinically significant toxicities were seen, diarrhea was seen in 1.9% and 13.5% of patients in the 1- and 3-g dose groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: POMx treatment was associated with ≥ 6 month increases in PSADT in both treatment arms without adverse effects. The significance of this on-study slowing of PSADT remains unclear, reinforcing the need for placebo-controlled studies in this patient population.
Authors: Emily C Chiang; Shuren Shen; Seema S Kengeri; Huiping Xu; Gerald F Combs; J Steven Morris; David G Bostwick; David J Waters Journal: Dose Response Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Arshi Malik; Farrukh Afaq; Sami Sarfaraz; Vaqar M Adhami; Deeba N Syed; Hasan Mukhtar Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin Albrecht; Wenguo Jiang; James Kumi-Diaka; Ephraim P Lansky; Lyndon M Gommersall; Amit Patel; Robert E Mansel; Ishak Neeman; Albert A Geldof; Moray J Campbell Journal: J Med Food Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.786
Authors: Philip M Arlen; Fernando Bianco; William L Dahut; Anthony D'Amico; William D Figg; Stephen J Freedland; James L Gulley; Philip W Kantoff; Michael W Kattan; Andrew Lee; Meredith M Regan; Oliver Sartor Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthew R Smith; Judith Manola; Donald S Kaufman; Daniel George; William K Oh; Elisabetta Mueller; Susan Slovin; Bruce Spiegelman; Eric Small; Philip W Kantoff Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Satomi Koyama; Laura J Cobb; Hemal H Mehta; Navindra P Seeram; David Heber; Allan J Pantuck; Pinchas Cohen Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: K Kuchta; Y Xiang; S Huang; Y Tang; X Peng; X Wang; Y Zhu; J Li; J Xu; Z Lin; T Pan Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: M Diana van Die; Scott G Williams; Jon Emery; Kerry M Bone; Jeremy M G Taylor; Elizabeth Lusk; Marie V Pirotta Journal: Prostate Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Channing J Paller; Xian C Zhou; Elisabeth I Heath; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Tina Mayer; Mark N Stein; Glenn J Bubley; Roberto Pili; Tamaro Hudson; Radhika Kakarla; Muneer M Abbas; Nicole M Anders; Donna Dowling; Serina King; Ashley B Bruns; William D Wagner; Charles G Drake; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Mario A Eisenberger; Samuel R Denmeade; Michelle A Rudek; Gary L Rosner; Michael A Carducci Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 12.531