Literature DB >> 4030266

Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision.

D I Rosenthal, M A Ganott, G Wyshak, D M Slovik, S H Doppelt, R M Neer.   

Abstract

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was performed in duplicate on 84 patients to test the short-term precision of the technique. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that precision was not a function of spinal density. It appeared to be worse in osteopenic individuals only when expressed as a percentage. Precision was slightly better in male than in female patients. There is a 90% likelihood that a duplicate measurement will fall within 20 CT units of the first determination in female patients and within ten units in male patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4030266     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198505000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

1.  Underestimation of bone loss of the spine with posterior-anterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  William A Bauman; Steven Kirshblum; Christopher Cirnigliaro; Gail F Forrest; Ann M Spungen
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Longitudinal changes in bone mass after one year as measured by different techniques in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  S M Ott; R F Kilcoyne; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Tarsal and metatarsal bone mineral density measurement using volumetric quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul K Commean; Tao Ju; Lu Liu; David R Sinacore; Mary K Hastings; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Hip fractures in young patients: is this early osteoporosis?

Authors:  S D Boden; P Labropoulos; R Saunders
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Quantitative computed tomography: update 1987.

Authors:  H K Genant; P Steiger; J E Block; C C Glueer; B Ettinger; S T Harris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom.

Authors:  S D Boden; D J Goodenough; C D Stockham; E Jacobs; T Dina; R M Allman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; I Vered; K C Fischer; M Griffin; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Vertebral cortical bone mass measurement by a new quantitative computer tomography method: correlations with vertebral trabecular bone measurements.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R C Rupich; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  A clinical study of alveolar bone quality using the fractal dimension and the implant stability quotient.

Authors:  Dae-Hyun Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Jeong-Ug Hong; Cheol-Woo Lee; Min-Suk Heo; Kyung-Hoe Huh
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.