Literature DB >> 2083540

Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

D O Slosman1, R Rizzoli, B Buchs, F Piana, A Donath, J P Bonjour.   

Abstract

We investigated the precision of gadolinium 153 dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) and quantitative digital radiography (QDR) bone densitometers by determining in vitro and in vivo coefficients of variation (CV) of bone mineral density (BMD). In vitro, the long-term CV of spine phantom BMD measured weekly for 40 weeks was 1.2% and 0.7% for DPA and QDR, respectively. Stimulating soft-tissue thickness with water, the CV of 6 repeat measurements of spine phantom at depths from 0 to 27 cm in 1 cm steps (a total of 168 measurements) increased from 0.1% at 0 cm of water to 2.5% at 27 cm for DPA, and from 0.2% at 0 cm to 1.4% at 27 cm for QDR; mean CV of the 28 series (0-27 cm) was higher for DPA (1.2% +/- 0.8%, mean +/- SD) than for QDR (0.7% +/- 0.6%; P less than 0.001). With the hip phantom, femoral neck BMD was determined, and the CV was also dependent on water thickness; mean CV of the 20 series (0-10 cm) was 2.1% +/- 1.2% for DPA and 1.3% +/- 0.9% for QDR (not significant). In vivo, at the spine level, with DPA, mean CV of BMD measured 6 times after repositioning in 6 healthy volunteers was 3.8% +/- 1.9% and 2.1% +/- 0.7% with 153 Gd activity of 0.46 Ci and 1 Ci, respectively (BMD range: 0.796-1.247 g/cm2, no significant difference between the two groups).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2083540     DOI: 10.1007/BF00819396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  20 in total

Review 1.  An evaluation of the contribution of bone mass measurements to clinical practice.

Authors:  I Fogelman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  [Measurement of bone mineral content by quantitative digital radiography. First results in the lumbar vertebrae].

Authors:  P Braillon; F Duboeuf; M F Meary; P Barret; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1989-05-27       Impact factor: 1.228

3.  En recherche de la différence (P less than 0.05).

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1986-04

4.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Dichromatic absorptiometry of vertebral bone mineral content.

Authors:  C R Wilson; M Madsen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Correction of the effects of source, source strength, and soft-tissue thickness on spine dual-photon absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; M S Deehr; P S Berger; G E Dallal; L J Sadowski
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Bone mass and its relationship to age and the menopause.

Authors:  L Nilas; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Sensitivity of dual-photon absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; J P Louvet; B Fournie; G Morlock; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Precision of dual photon absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  A D LeBlanc; H J Evans; C Marsh; V Schneider; P C Johnson; S G Jhingran
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems.

Authors:  O L Svendsen; U Marslew; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

3.  Bone mineral and body fat measurements by two absorptiometry systems: comparisons with neutron activation analysis.

Authors:  R N Pierson; J Wang; J C Thornton; D P Kotler; S B Heymsfield; D A Weber; R M Ma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Variation in spinal and femoral bone mass gain, energy and calcium intake during adolescence.

Authors:  J P Bonjour; G Theintz; B Buchs; D Slosman; H Clavien; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density.

Authors:  H Young; S Howey; D W Purdie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Sodium monofluorophosphate increases vertebral bone mineral density in patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; T Chevalley; D O Slosman; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Relationship between bone mineral density and dietary intakes in the elderly.

Authors:  G Geinoz; C H Rapin; R Rizzoli; R Kraemer; B Buchs; D Slosman; J P Michel; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Influence of patient's weight on dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density.

Authors:  P Martin; M Verhas; C Als; L Geerts; J Paternot; P Bergmann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Preferential low bone mineral density of the femoral neck in patients with a recent fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  T Chevalley; R Rizzoli; V Nydegger; D Slosman; L Tkatch; C H Rapin; H Vasey; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; P Braillon; M C Chapuy; P Haond; C Hardouin; M F Meary; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.