Literature DB >> 2059876

In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.

M L Rencken1, R Murano, B L Drinkwater, C H Chesnut.   

Abstract

Six Hologic QDR-1000 DEXA bone densitometers at different centers across the USA were compared to determine the intermachine variability. Nine scans in succession were acquired on each machine using a single anthropomorphic lumbar spine phantom (manufactured by Hologic). Values for BMC, area, and BMD were recorded for each measurement. Means, standard deviations (SD), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each machine. All the CVs (BMC, area, BMD) were less than 1% (range 0.3%-0.6%). The CV of the means at the six sites were 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.5% for BMC, area, and BMD, respectively. Although several significant differences for BMC, area, and BMD were noted by ANOVA between machines at different sites, the difference between the highest and lowest means of the individual machines was only 1.1%, 1.31%, and 1.07% for BMC, area, and BMD. The small variations between the DEXA systems are encouraging for researchers involved in multicenter trials in which data are pooled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2059876     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  5 in total

1.  Effect of source strength and attenuation on dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M C DaCosta; M M Luckey; D E Meier; J P Mandeli; M L DeLaney; P H Stritzke; S J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Should women get screening bone mass measurements?

Authors:  S Ott
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; I Vered; K C Fischer; M Griffin; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Dual photon absorptiometric measurements of bone mineral density increase with source life.

Authors:  R Lindsay; C Fey; A Haboubi
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial.

Authors:  B Lees; S W Garland; C Walton; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Irreversible bone loss in former amenorrheic athletes.

Authors:  A D Keen; B L Drinkwater
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; B Zegels; I Jupsin; A Albert; P Franchimont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Phantom studies in osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Fischer; B Kempers
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-05

5.  Precision of dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units.

Authors:  M Wapniarz; R Lehmann; O Randerath; S Baedeker; W John; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  D Hans; A M Schott; M C Chapuy; M Benamar; P D Kotzki; C Cormier; J M Pouilles; P J Meunier
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision.

Authors:  K Lai; M Rencken; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  The effect of increasing gap width on localized densitometric changes within tibial ostectomies in a canine model.

Authors:  M D Markel; J J Bogdanske
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Factors influencing short-term precision of dual X-ray bone absorptiometry (DXA) of spine and femur.

Authors:  K Engelke; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  A Prospective, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Evaluation of the Effect of Omeprazole on Serum Calcium, Magnesium, Cobalamin, Gastrin Concentrations, and Bone in Cats.

Authors:  E Gould; C Clements; A Reed; L Giori; J M Steiner; J A Lidbury; J S Suchodolski; M Brand; T Moyers; L Emery; M K Tolbert
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.333

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.