Literature DB >> 31015609

Ectopic expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 improves homology-directed repair during CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.

Bruna S Paulsen1,2, Pankaj K Mandal1,2,3, Richard L Frock2,4, Baris Boyraz5,6, Rachita Yadav7,8,9, Srigokul Upadhyayula2,3,10, Paula Gutierrez-Martinez1,2, Wataru Ebina1,2, Anders Fasth11, Tomas Kirchhausen2,3,10, Michael E Talkowski7,8,9, Suneet Agarwal3,5,12,13, Frederick W Alt2,4,14, Derrick J Rossi15,16,17,18.   

Abstract

Gene disruption by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) is highly efficient and relies on the error-prone non-homologous end-joining pathway. Conversely, precise gene editing requires homology-directed repair (HDR), which occurs at a lower frequency than non-homologous end-joining in mammalian cells. Here, by testing whether manipulation of DNA repair factors improves HDR efficacy, we show that transient ectopic co-expression of RAD52 and a dominant-negative form of tumour protein p53-binding protein 1 (dn53BP1) synergize to enable efficient HDR using a single-stranded oligonucleotide DNA donor template at multiple loci in human cells, including patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Co-expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 improves multiplexed HDR-mediated editing, whereas expression of RAD52 alone enhances HDR with Cas9 nickase. Our data show that the frequency of non-homologous end-joining-mediated double-strand break repair in the presence of these two factors is not suppressed and suggest that dn53BP1 competitively antagonizes 53BP1 to augment HDR in combination with RAD52. Importantly, co-expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 does not alter Cas9 off-target activity. These findings support the use of RAD52 and dn53BP1 co-expression to overcome bottlenecks that limit HDR in precision genome editing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 31015609      PMCID: PMC6918705          DOI: 10.1038/s41551-017-0145-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2157-846X            Impact factor:   25.671


  76 in total

1.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish.

Authors:  Alexander Hruscha; Peter Krawitz; Alexandra Rechenberg; Verena Heinrich; Jochen Hecht; Christian Haass; Bettina Schmid
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington; Jean Gautier
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Improved Genome Editing Efficiency and Flexibility Using Modified Oligonucleotides with TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 Nucleases.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Renaud; Charlotte Boix; Marine Charpentier; Anne De Cian; Julien Cochennec; Evelyne Duvernois-Berthet; Loïc Perrouault; Laurent Tesson; Joanne Edouard; Reynald Thinard; Yacine Cherifi; Séverine Menoret; Sandra Fontanière; Noémie de Crozé; Alexandre Fraichard; Frédéric Sohm; Ignacio Anegon; Jean-Paul Concordet; Carine Giovannangeli
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  53BP1 fosters fidelity of homology-directed DNA repair.

Authors:  Fena Ochs; Kumar Somyajit; Matthias Altmeyer; Maj-Britt Rask; Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  Conservative repair of a chromosomal double-strand break by single-strand DNA through two steps of annealing.

Authors:  Francesca Storici; Joyce R Snipe; Godwin K Chan; Dmitry A Gordenin; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Regulation of DNA end joining, resection, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination by 53BP1.

Authors:  Anne Bothmer; Davide F Robbiani; Michela Di Virgilio; Samuel F Bunting; Isaac A Klein; Niklas Feldhahn; Jacqueline Barlow; Hua-Tang Chen; David Bosque; Elsa Callen; André Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Distinct roles of chromatin-associated proteins MDC1 and 53BP1 in mammalian double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Anyong Xie; Andrea Hartlerode; Manuel Stucki; Shobu Odate; Nadine Puget; Amy Kwok; Ganesh Nagaraju; Catherine Yan; Frederick W Alt; Junjie Chen; Stephen P Jackson; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Michael Bozzella; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-08-20

9.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Harnessing mutagenic homologous recombination for targeted mutagenesis in vivo by TaGTEAM.

Authors:  Shawn P Finney-Manchester; Narendra Maheshri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  27 in total

1.  Emerging roles of RNA modifications in genome integrity.

Authors:  Seo Yun Lee; Jae Jin Kim; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways.

Authors:  Charles D Yeh; Christopher D Richardson; Jacob E Corn
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Modulation of DNA double-strand break repair as a strategy to improve precise genome editing.

Authors:  Ujjayinee Ray; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 4.  Single-strand template repair: key insights to increase the efficiency of gene editing.

Authors:  Danielle N Gallagher; James E Haber
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  Enhanced homology-directed repair for highly efficient gene editing in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Suk See De Ravin; Julie Brault; Ronald J Meis; Siyuan Liu; Linhong Li; Mara Pavel-Dinu; Cicera R Lazzarotto; Taylor Liu; Sherry M Koontz; Uimook Choi; Colin L Sweeney; Narda Theobald; GaHyun Lee; Aaron B Clark; Sandra S Burkett; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Matthew H Porteus; Shengdar Tsai; Douglas B Kuhns; Gary A Dahl; Stephen Headey; Xiaolin Wu; Harry L Malech
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Correction of X-CGD patient HSPCs by targeted CYBB cDNA insertion using CRISPR/Cas9 with 53BP1 inhibition for enhanced homology-directed repair.

Authors:  Colin L Sweeney; Mara Pavel-Dinu; Uimook Choi; Julie Brault; Taylor Liu; Sherry Koontz; Linhong Li; Narda Theobald; Janet Lee; Ezekiel A Bello; Xiaolin Wu; Ronald J Meis; Gary A Dahl; Matthew H Porteus; Harry L Malech; Suk See De Ravin
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  CRISPR-targeted MAGT1 insertion restores XMEN patient hematopoietic stem cells and lymphocytes.

Authors:  Julie Brault; Taylor Liu; Ezekiel Bello; Siyuan Liu; Colin L Sweeney; Ronald J Meis; Sherry Koontz; Cristina Corsino; Uimook Choi; Guillaume Vayssiere; Marita Bosticardo; Kennichi Dowdell; Cicera R Lazzarotto; Aaron B Clark; Luigi D Notarangelo; Juan C Ravell; Michael J Lenardo; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Shengdar Q Tsai; Xiaolin Wu; Gary A Dahl; Harry L Malech; Suk See De Ravin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 25.476

Review 9.  DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing.

Authors:  Chaoyou Xue; Eric C Greene
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 11.821

Review 10.  Telomerase RNA processing: Implications for human health and disease.

Authors:  Neha Nagpal; Suneet Agarwal
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.