Literature DB >> 18675941

Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells.

Zhiyong Mao1, Michael Bozzella, Andrei Seluanov, Vera Gorbunova.   

Abstract

The two major pathways for repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). HR leads to accurate repair, while NHEJ is intrinsically mutagenic. To understand human somatic mutation it is essential to know the relationship between these pathways in human cells. Here we provide a comparison of the kinetics and relative contributions of HR and NHEJ in normal human cells. We used chromosomally integrated fluorescent reporter substrates for real-time in vivo monitoring of the NHEJ and HR. By examining multiple integrated clones we show that the efficiency of NHEJ and HR is strongly influenced by chromosomal location. Furthermore, we show that NHEJ of compatible ends (NHEJ-C) and NHEJ of incompatible ends (NHEJ-I) are fast processes, which can be completed in approximately 30 min, while HR is much slower and takes 7h or longer to complete. In actively cycling cells NHEJ-C is twice as efficient as NHEJ-I, and NHEJ-I is three times more efficient than HR. Our results suggest that NHEJ is a faster and more efficient DSB repair pathway than HR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18675941      PMCID: PMC2695993          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  22 in total

Review 1.  Partners and pathwaysrepairing a double-strand break.

Authors:  J E Haber
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination.

Authors:  Marie Frank-Vaillant; Stéphane Marcand
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Ageing, repetitive genomes and DNA damage.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber; Zarir E Karanjawala
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  After double-strand break induction by UV-A, homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining cooperate at the same DSB if both systems are available.

Authors:  Alexander Rapp; Karl Otto Greulich
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution.

Authors:  Holger Puchta
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Measurement of DNA double-strand breaks in CHO cells at various stages of the cell cycle using pulsed field gel electrophoresis: calibration by means of 125I decay.

Authors:  G E Iliakis; O Cicilioni; L Metzger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 7.  The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Absence of cancer-associated changes in human fibroblasts immortalized with telomerase.

Authors:  C P Morales; S E Holt; M Ouellette; K J Kaur; Y Yan; K S Wilson; M A White; W E Wright; J W Shay
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci.

Authors:  Enriqueta Riballo; Martin Kühne; Nicole Rief; Aidan Doherty; Graeme C M Smith; María-José Recio; Caroline Reis; Kirsten Dahm; Andreas Fricke; Andrea Krempler; Antony R Parker; Stephen P Jackson; Andrew Gennery; Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jong-Soo Kim; Tatiana B Krasieva; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; David J Chen; A Malcolm R Taylor; Kyoko Yokomori
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  233 in total

1.  Pathways for double-strand break repair in genetically unstable Z-DNA-forming sequences.

Authors:  Diem T Kha; Guliang Wang; Nithya Natrajan; Lynn Harrison; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Analysis of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Andrei Seluanov; Zhiyong Mao; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Circadian molecular clock in lung pathophysiology.

Authors:  Isaac K Sundar; Hongwei Yao; Michael T Sellix; Irfan Rahman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 4.  Repair of a Site-Specific DNA Cleavage: Old-School Lessons for Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing.

Authors:  Danielle N Gallagher; James E Haber
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 5.  Pharmacological methods to transcriptionally modulate double-strand break DNA repair.

Authors:  Alanna R Kaplan; Peter M Glazer
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.813

6.  The BRCA1-RAP80 complex regulates DNA repair mechanism utilization by restricting end resection.

Authors:  Kara A Coleman; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  DNA damage response in adult stem cells: pathways and consequences.

Authors:  Pankaj K Mandal; Cédric Blanpain; Derrick J Rossi
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 94.444

8.  Preservation of genomic integrity in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Peter J Stambrook; Elisia D Tichy
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  Clinically Applicable Inhibitors Impacting Genome Stability.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Juan F Garcia-Moreno; James A L Brown; Emer Bourke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  DNA damage response, redox status and hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Cary N Weiss; Keisuke Ito
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.