Literature DB >> 33896583

DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing.

Chaoyou Xue1, Eric C Greene2.   

Abstract

Many clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9)-based genome editing technologies take advantage of Cas nucleases to induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at desired locations within a genome. Further processing of the DSBs by the cellular DSB repair machinery is then necessary to introduce desired mutations, sequence insertions, or gene deletions. Thus, the accuracy and efficiency of genome editing are influenced by the cellular DSB repair pathways. DSBs are themselves highly genotoxic lesions and as such cells have evolved multiple mechanisms for their repair. These repair pathways include homologous recombination (HR), classical nonhomologous end joining (cNHEJ), microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA). In this review, we briefly highlight CRISPR-Cas9 and then describe the mechanisms of DSB repair. Finally, we summarize recent findings of factors that can influence the choice of DNA repair pathway in response to Cas9-induced DSBs.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33896583      PMCID: PMC8187289          DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.821


  210 in total

1.  Precise and Predictable CRISPR Chromosomal Rearrangements Reveal Principles of Cas9-Mediated Nucleotide Insertion.

Authors:  Jia Shou; Jinhuan Li; Yingbin Liu; Qiang Wu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  DNA2 cooperates with the WRN and BLM RecQ helicases to mediate long-range DNA end resection in human cells.

Authors:  Andreas Sturzenegger; Kamila Burdova; Radhakrishnan Kanagaraj; Maryna Levikova; Cosimo Pinto; Petr Cejka; Pavel Janscak
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  DNA end resection by CtIP and exonuclease 1 prevents genomic instability.

Authors:  Wassim Eid; Martin Steger; Mahmoud El-Shemerly; Lorenza P Ferretti; Javier Peña-Diaz; Christiane König; Emanuele Valtorta; Alessandro A Sartori; Stefano Ferrari
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Jungeun Kim; Junho K Hur; Kyung Wook Been; Sun-Heui Yoon; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Meena Shrivastav; Leyma P De Haro; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 6.  An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair.

Authors:  Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Meganucleases and other tools for targeted genome engineering: perspectives and challenges for gene therapy.

Authors:  George Silva; Laurent Poirot; Roman Galetto; Julianne Smith; Guillermo Montoya; Philippe Duchateau; Frédéric Pâques
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.391

8.  Precise therapeutic gene correction by a simple nuclease-induced double-stranded break.

Authors:  Sukanya Iyer; Sneha Suresh; Dongsheng Guo; Katelyn Daman; Jennifer C J Chen; Pengpeng Liu; Marina Zieger; Kevin Luk; Benjamin P Roscoe; Christian Mueller; Oliver D King; Charles P Emerson; Scot A Wolfe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity.

Authors:  Vikram Pattanayak; Steven Lin; John P Guilinger; Enbo Ma; Jennifer A Doudna; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  RPA coordinates DNA end resection and prevents formation of DNA hairpins.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Michael Lisby; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  14 in total

1.  Impacts of RNA Mobility Signals on Virus Induced Somatic and Germline Gene Editing.

Authors:  Bliss M Beernink; Ryan R Lappe; Melissa Bredow; Steven A Whitham
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 2.  Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jacob S Antony; John M Hinz; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene disruption in the tetraploid protist Giardia intestinalis.

Authors:  Vendula Horáčková; Luboš Voleman; Kari D Hagen; Markéta Petrů; Martina Vinopalová; Filip Weisz; Natalia Janowicz; Lenka Marková; Alžběta Motyčková; Vladimíra Najdrová; Pavla Tůmová; Scott C Dawson; Pavel Doležal
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  DNA replication: the recombination connection.

Authors:  Esther A Epum; James E Haber
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  pH-Responsive Polymer Nanoparticles for Efficient Delivery of Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein With or Without Donor DNA.

Authors:  Ruosen Xie; Xiuxiu Wang; Yuyuan Wang; Mingzhou Ye; Yi Zhao; Brian S Yandell; Shaoqin Gong
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 32.086

6.  CRISPR-Cas12a ribonucleoprotein-mediated gene editing in the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae.

Authors:  Jun Huang; David E Cook
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-12-24

7.  Promoterless Gene Targeting Approach Combined to CRISPR/Cas9 Efficiently Corrects Hemophilia B Phenotype in Neonatal Mice.

Authors:  Michela Lisjak; Alessia De Caneva; Thibaut Marais; Elena Barbon; Maria Grazia Biferi; Fabiola Porro; Adi Barzel; Lorena Zentilin; Mark A Kay; Federico Mingozzi; Andrés F Muro
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-03-11

8.  Target residence of Cas9-sgRNA influences DNA double-strand break repair pathway choices in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.

Authors:  Si-Cheng Liu; Yi-Li Feng; Xiu-Na Sun; Ruo-Dan Chen; Qian Liu; Jing-Jing Xiao; Jin-Na Zhang; Zhi-Cheng Huang; Ji-Feng Xiang; Guo-Qiao Chen; Yi Yang; Chao Lou; Hao-Dan Li; Zhen Cai; Shi-Ming Xu; Hui Lin; An-Yong Xie
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 17.906

Review 9.  Current landscape of gene-editing technology in biomedicine: Applications, advantages, challenges, and perspectives.

Authors:  Weilin Zhou; Jinrong Yang; Yalan Zhang; Xiaoyi Hu; Wei Wang
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-07-14

10.  TP53-dependent toxicity of CRISPR/Cas9 cuts is differential across genomic loci and can confound genetic screening.

Authors:  Miguel M Álvarez; Josep Biayna; Fran Supek
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 17.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.