Literature DB >> 31015062

Nonlinearity and amplification in cochlear responses to single and multi-tone stimuli.

Elika Fallah1, C Elliott Strimbu2, Elizabeth S Olson3.   

Abstract

Mechanical displacements of the basilar membrane (BM) and the electrophysiological responses of the auditory outer hair cells (OHCs) are key components of the frequency tuning and cochlear amplification in the mammalian cochlea. In the work presented here, we measured the responses of (1) the extracellular voltage generated by OHCs (VOHC) and (2) displacements within the organ of Corti complex (OCC) to a multi-tone stimulus, and to single tones. Using optical coherence tomography (OCT), we were able to measure displacements of different layers in the OCC simultaneously, in the base of the gerbil cochlea. We explored the effect of the two types of sound stimuli to the nonlinear behavior of voltage and displacement in two frequency regions: a frequency region below the BM nonlinearity (sub-BF region: f < ∼0.7 BF), and in the best frequency (BF) region. In the sub-BF region, BM motion (XBM) had linear growth for both stimulus types, and the motion in the OHC region (XOHC) was mildly nonlinear for single tones, and relatively strongly nonlinear for multi-tones. Sub-BF, the nonlinear character of VOHC was similar to that of XOHC. In the BF region XBM, VOHC and XOHC all possessed the now-classic nonlinearity of the BF peak. Coupling these observations with previous findings on phasing between OHC force and traveling wave motions, we propose the following framework for cochlear nonlinearity: The BF-region nonlinearity is an amplifying nonlinearity, in which OHC forces input power into the traveling wave, allowing it to travel further apical to the region where it peaks. The sub-BF nonlinearity is a non-amplifying nonlinearity; it represents OHC electromotility, and saturates due to OHC current saturation, but the OHC forces do not possess the proper phasing to feed power into the traveling wave.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31015062      PMCID: PMC6511461          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  27 in total

1.  Direct measurement of intra-cochlear pressure waves.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Limiting dynamics of high-frequency electromechanical transduction of outer hair cells.

Authors:  G Frank; W Hemmert; A W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mutual suppression in the 6 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Two-Tone Suppression of Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Responses in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Frequency selectivity without resonance in a fluid waveguide.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  W E Brownell; C R Bader; D Bertrand; Y de Ribaupierre
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Localization of the cochlear amplifier in living sensitive ears.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Edward Porsov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Manipulation of the Endocochlear Potential Reveals Two Distinct Types of Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  C Elliott Strimbu; Yi Wang; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Choongheon Lee; John J Guinan; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Interactions between Passive and Active Vibrations in the Organ of Corti In Vitro.

Authors:  Talat Jabeen; Joseph C Holt; Jonathan R Becker; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Sound Induced Vibrations Deform the Organ of Corti Complex in the Low-Frequency Apical Region of the Gerbil Cochlea for Normal Hearing : Sound Induced Vibrations Deform the Organ of Corti Complex.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Xiaohui Lin; B Hyle Park; Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-07

5.  Using volumetric optical coherence tomography to achieve spatially resolved organ of Corti vibration measurements.

Authors:  Brian L Frost; Clark Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Novel 3D-printed hollow microneedles facilitate safe, reliable, and informative sampling of perilymph from guinea pigs.

Authors:  Betsy Szeto; Aykut Aksit; Chris Valentini; Michelle Yu; Emily G Werth; Shahar Goeta; Chuanning Tang; Lewis M Brown; Elizabeth S Olson; Jeffrey W Kysar; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04

Review 8.  The interplay of organ-of-Corti vibrational modes, not tectorial- membrane resonance, sets outer-hair-cell stereocilia phase to produce cochlear amplification.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Impact of Systemic versus Intratympanic Dexamethasone Administration on the Perilymph Proteome.

Authors:  Betsy Szeto; Chris Valentini; Aykut Aksit; Emily G Werth; Shahar Goeta; Lewis M Brown; Elizabeth S Olson; Jeffrey W Kysar; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.