Literature DB >> 27760366

Two-Tone Suppression of Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Responses in the Cochlea.

Wei Dong1, Elizabeth S Olson2.   

Abstract

Cochlear frequency tuning is based on a mildly tuned traveling-wave response that is enhanced in amplitude and sharpness by outer hair cell (OHC)-based forces. The nonlinear and active character of this enhancement is the fundamental manifestation of cochlear amplification. Recently, mechanical (pressure) and electrical (extracellular OHC-generated voltage) responses were simultaneously measured close to the sensory tissue's basilar membrane. Both pressure and voltage were tuned and showed traveling-wave phase accumulation, evidence that they were locally generated responses. Approximately at the frequency where nonlinearity commenced, the phase of extracellular voltage shifted up, to lead pressure by >1/4 cycle. Based on established and fundamental relationships among voltage, force, pressure, displacement, and power, the observed phase shift was identified as the activation of cochlear amplification. In this study, the operation of the cochlear amplifier was further explored, via changes in pressure and voltage responses upon delivery of a second, suppressor tone. Two different suppression paradigms were used, one with a low-frequency suppressor and a swept-frequency probe, the other with two swept-frequency tones, either of which can be considered as probe or suppressor. In the presence of a high-level low-frequency suppressor, extracellular voltage responses at probe-tone frequencies were greatly reduced, and the pressure responses were reduced nearly to their linear, passive level. On the other hand, the amplifier-activating phase shift between pressure and voltage responses was still present in probe-tone responses. These findings are consistent with low-frequency suppression being caused by the saturation of OHC electrical responses and not by a change in the power-enabling phasing of the underlying mechanics. In the two-tone swept-frequency suppression paradigm, mild suppression was apparent in the pressure responses, while deep notches could develop in the voltage responses. A simple analysis, based on a two-wave differencing scheme, was used to explore the observations.
Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27760366      PMCID: PMC5073056          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  31 in total

1.  Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Determinants of the spectrum of the neural electrical activity at the round window: transmitter release and neural depolarisation.

Authors:  R B Patuzzi; D J Brown; C M McMahon; A F Halliday
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Intracochlear Scala Media Pressure Measurement: Implications for Models of Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Sushrut S Kale; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Physiological correlates of off-frequency listening.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  In vivo impedance of the gerbil cochlear partition at auditory frequencies.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Jessica S Lamb; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Two-tone suppression of basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the guinea pig cochlea using "low-side" suppressors.

Authors:  C D Geisler; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  W S Rhode; N P Cooper
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  12 in total

1.  Adaptation of Cochlear Amplification to Low Endocochlear Potential.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Elika Fallah; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Interactions between Passive and Active Vibrations in the Organ of Corti In Vitro.

Authors:  Talat Jabeen; Joseph C Holt; Jonathan R Becker; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Nonlinearity and amplification in cochlear responses to single and multi-tone stimuli.

Authors:  Elika Fallah; C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; James B Dewey; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; John S Oghalai; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

5.  Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Alessandro Altoè; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12

6.  Probing hair cell's mechano-transduction using two-tone suppression measurements.

Authors:  Wenxiao Zhou; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The interplay of organ-of-Corti vibrational modes, not tectorial- membrane resonance, sets outer-hair-cell stereocilia phase to produce cochlear amplification.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nonlinearity of intracochlear motion and local cochlear microphonic: Comparison between guinea pig and gerbil.

Authors:  Elika Fallah; C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.672

10.  Two passive mechanical conditions modulate power generation by the outer hair cells.

Authors:  Yanju Liu; Sheryl M Gracewski; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.