Literature DB >> 33091378

Manipulation of the Endocochlear Potential Reveals Two Distinct Types of Cochlear Nonlinearity.

C Elliott Strimbu1, Yi Wang2, Elizabeth S Olson3.   

Abstract

The mammalian hearing organ, the cochlea, contains an active amplifier to boost the vibrational response to low level sounds. Hallmarks of this active process are sharp location-dependent frequency tuning and compressive nonlinearity over a wide stimulus range. The amplifier relies on outer hair cell (OHC)-generated forces driven in part by the endocochlear potential, the ∼+80 mV potential maintained in scala media, generated by the stria vascularis. We transiently eliminated the endocochlear potential in vivo by an intravenous injection of furosemide and measured the vibrations of different layers in the cochlea's organ of Corti using optical coherence tomography. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions were also monitored. After furosemide injection, the vibrations of the basilar membrane lost the best frequency (BF) peak and showed broad tuning similar to a passive cochlea. The intra-organ of Corti vibrations measured in the region of the OHCs lost the BF peak and showed low-pass responses but retained nonlinearity. This strongly suggests that OHC electromotility was operating and being driven by nonlinear OHC current. Thus, although electromotility is presumably necessary to produce a healthy BF peak, the mere presence of electromotility is not sufficient. The BF peak recovered nearly fully within 2 h, along with the recovery of odd-order distortion product otoacoustic emissions. The recovery pattern suggests that physical shifts in operating condition are a critical step in the recovery process.
Copyright © 2020 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33091378      PMCID: PMC7732743          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  64 in total

Review 1.  Static material properties of the tectorial membrane: a summary.

Authors:  Dennis M Freeman; Kinuko Masaki; Abraham R McAllister; Jesse L Wei; Thomas F Weiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Jessica S Lamb; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Adaptation of Cochlear Amplification to Low Endocochlear Potential.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Elika Fallah; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Signal competition in optical coherence tomography and its relevance for cochlear vibrometry.

Authors:  Nathan C Lin; Christine P Hendon; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; David Kemp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation.

Authors:  D M Mills; S J Norton; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Elimination kinetics of furosemide in perilymph and serum of the chinchilla. Neuropharmacologic correlates.

Authors:  L P Rybak; T P Green; S K Juhn; T Morizono; B L Mirkin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane.

Authors:  Ian J Russell; P Kevin Legan; Victoria A Lukashkina; Andrei N Lukashkin; Richard J Goodyear; Guy P Richardson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Control of hearing sensitivity by tectorial membrane calcium.

Authors:  Clark Elliott Strimbu; Sonal Prasad; Pierre Hakizimana; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Using volumetric optical coherence tomography to achieve spatially resolved organ of Corti vibration measurements.

Authors:  Brian L Frost; Clark Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Inner hair cell stereocilia displacement in response to focal stimulation of the basilar membrane in the ex vivo gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Aleksandrs Zosuls; Laura C Rupprecht; David C Mountain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Model of cochlear microphonic explores the tuning and magnitude of hair cell transduction current.

Authors:  Brian Frost; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  An outer hair cell-powered global hydromechanical mechanism for cochlear amplification.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; George Burwood; Anders Fridberger; Alfred L Nuttall; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.672

5.  Salicylate-induced changes in organ of Corti vibrations.

Authors:  C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.672

6.  Best frequencies and temporal delays are similar across the low-frequency regions of the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  George Burwood; Pierre Hakizimana; Alfred L Nuttall; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 14.957

7.  Nonlinearity of intracochlear motion and local cochlear microphonic: Comparison between guinea pig and gerbil.

Authors:  Elika Fallah; C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.672

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.