Literature DB >> 31968228

The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Shawn S Goodman1, Choongheon Lee2, John J Guinan3, Jeffery T Lichtenhan4.   

Abstract

Cochlear amplification of basilar membrane traveling waves is thought to occur between a tone's characteristic frequency (CF) place and within one octave basal of the CF. Evidence for this view comes only from the cochlear base. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) provide a noninvasive alternative to direct measurements of cochlear motion that can be measured across a wide range of CF regions. Coherent reflection theory indicates that SFOAEs arise mostly from the peak region of the traveling wave, but several studies using far-basal suppressor tones claimed that SFOAE components originate many octaves basal of CF. We measured SFOAEs while perfusing guinea pig cochleas from apex to base with salicylate or KCl solutions that reduced outer-hair-cell function and SFOAE amplification. Solution effects on inner hair cells reduced auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) and provided reference times for when solutions reached the SFOAE-frequency CF region. As solution flowed from apex to base, SFOAE reductions generally occurred later than CAP reductions and showed that the effects of cochlear amplification usually peaked ∼1/2 octave basal of the CF region. For tones ≥2 kHz, cochlear amplification typically extended ∼1.5 octaves basal of CF, and the data are consistent with coherent reflection theory. SFOAE amplification did not extend to the basal end of the cochlea, even though reticular lamina motion is amplified in this region, which indicates that reticular lamina motion is not directly coupled to basilar membrane traveling waves. Previous reports of SFOAE-frequency residuals produced by suppressor frequencies far above the SFOAE frequency are most likely due to additional sources created by the suppressor. For some tones <2 kHz, SFOAE amplification extended two octaves apical of CF, which highlights that different vibratory motions produce SFOAEs and CAPs, and that the amplification region depends on the cochlear mode of motion considered. The concept that there is a single "cochlear amplification region" needs to be revised.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31968228      PMCID: PMC7063421          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  43 in total

1.  Auditory-nerve-fiber responses to high-level clicks: interference patterns indicate that excitation is due to the combination of multiple drives.

Authors:  T Lin; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Large endolymphatic potentials from low-frequency and infrasonic tones in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Alec N Salt; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Ruth M Gill; Jared J Hartsock
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Saturation of outer hair cell receptor currents causes two-tone suppression.

Authors:  C D Geisler; G K Yates; R B Patuzzi; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Anping Xia; Jinkyung Kim; Nicolas Grillet; Brian E Applegate; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats.

Authors:  W F Sewell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model.

Authors:  Yong-Sun Choi; Soo-Young Lee; Kourosh Parham; Stephen T Neely; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Unusual mechanical processing of sounds at the apex of the Guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  How are inner hair cells stimulated? Evidence for multiple mechanical drives.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Vibration hotspots reveal longitudinal funneling of sound-evoked motion in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Nigel P Cooper; Anna Vavakou; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  6 in total

1.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Altered mapping of sound frequency to cochlear place in ears with endolymphatic hydrops provide insight into the pitch anomaly of diplacusis.

Authors:  J J Guinan; S M Lefler; C A Buchman; S S Goodman; J T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Measurements From Ears With Endolymphatic Hydrops and 2-Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin Provide Evidence That Loudness Recruitment Can Have a Cochlear Origin.

Authors:  Shannon M Lefler; Robert K Duncan; Shawn S Goodman; John J Guinan; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-10-05

Review 5.  The interplay of organ-of-Corti vibrational modes, not tectorial- membrane resonance, sets outer-hair-cell stereocilia phase to produce cochlear amplification.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.