Literature DB >> 32784038

The interplay of organ-of-Corti vibrational modes, not tectorial- membrane resonance, sets outer-hair-cell stereocilia phase to produce cochlear amplification.

John J Guinan1.   

Abstract

The mechanical motions that deflect outer-hair-cell (OHC) stereocilia and the resulting effects of OHC motility are reviewed, concentrating on high-frequency cochlear regions. It has been proposed that a tectorial-membrane (TM) resonance makes the phase of OHC stereocilia motion be appropriate to produce cochlear amplification, i.e. so that the OHC force that pushes the basilar membrane (BM) is in the same direction as BM velocity. Evidence for and against the TM-resonance hypothesis are considered, including new cochlear-motion measurements using optical coherence tomography, and it is concluded that there is no such TM resonance. The evidence points to there being an advance in the phase of reticular lamina (RL) radial motion at a frequency approximately ½ octave below the BM characteristic frequency, and that this is the main source of the phase difference between the TM and RL radial motions that produces cochlear amplification. It appears that the change in phase of RL radial motion comes about because of a transition between different organ-of-Corti (OoC) vibrational modes that changes RL motion relative to BM and TM motion. The origins and consequences of the large phase change of RL radial motion relative to BM motion are considered; differences in the reported patterns of these changes may be due to different viewing angles. Detailed motion data and new models are needed to better specify the vibrational patterns of the OoC modes and the role of the various OoC structures in producing the modes and the mode transition.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear amplification; Organ of Corti; Reticular lamina; Tectorial membrane

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32784038      PMCID: PMC7502208          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  61 in total

1.  Medial efferent effects on auditory-nerve responses to tail-frequency tones. I. Rate reduction.

Authors:  K M Stankovic; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. II. From data to models--and back.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Organ of Corti vibration within the intact gerbil cochlea measured by volumetric optical coherence tomography and vibrometry.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Anping Xia; Patrick D Raphael; Sunil Puria; Brian Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Non-tip auditory-nerve responses that are suppressed by low-frequency bias tones originate from reticular lamina motion.

Authors:  Hui Nam; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  A model for transducer action in the cochlea.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1965

7.  Shearing motion in the hearing organ measured by confocal laser heterodyne interferometry.

Authors:  M Ulfendahl; S M Khanna; C Heneghan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-05-30       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Unusual mechanical processing of sounds at the apex of the Guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The frequency limit of outer hair cell motility measured in vivo.

Authors:  Anna Vavakou; Nigel P Cooper; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sound Induced Vibrations Deform the Organ of Corti Complex in the Low-Frequency Apical Region of the Gerbil Cochlea for Normal Hearing : Sound Induced Vibrations Deform the Organ of Corti Complex.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Xiaohui Lin; B Hyle Park; Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-07

2.  Cochlear Fluid Spaces and Structures of the Gerbil High-Frequency Region Measured Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).

Authors:  Nam Hyun Cho; Haobing Wang; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-22

3.  An outer hair cell-powered global hydromechanical mechanism for cochlear amplification.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; George Burwood; Anders Fridberger; Alfred L Nuttall; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.672

4.  Vector of motion measurements in the living cochlea using a 3D OCT vibrometry system.

Authors:  Wihan Kim; Derek Liu; Sangmin Kim; Kumara Ratnayake; Frank Macias-Escriva; Scott Mattison; John S Oghalai; Brian E Applegate
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  A role for tectorial membrane mechanics in activating the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  Amir Nankali; Yi Wang; Clark Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Nonlinearity of intracochlear motion and local cochlear microphonic: Comparison between guinea pig and gerbil.

Authors:  Elika Fallah; C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.672

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.