| Literature DB >> 30597257 |
Tanyaradzwa Rodgers Ngara1, Houjin Zhang2.
Abstract
Metagenomes from uncultured microorganisms are rich resources for novel enzyme genes. The methods used to screen the metagenomic libraries fall into two categories, which are based on sequence or function of the enzymes. The sequence-based approaches rely on the known sequences of the target gene families. In contrast, the function-based approaches do not involve the incorporation of metagenomic sequencing data and, therefore, may lead to the discovery of novel gene sequences with desired functions. In this review, we discuss the function-based screening strategies that have been used in the identification of enzymes from metagenomes. Because of its simplicity, agar plate screening is most commonly used in the identification of novel enzymes with diverse functions. Other screening methods with higher sensitivity are also employed, such as microtiter plate screening. Furthermore, several ultra-high-throughput methods were developed to deal with large metagenomic libraries. Among these are the FACS-based screening, droplet-based screening, and the in vivo reporter-based screening methods. The application of these novel screening strategies has increased the chance for the discovery of novel enzyme genes.Entities:
Keywords: Agar plate screening; FACS-based screening; Function-based screening; Metagenomics; Microfluidics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30597257 PMCID: PMC6411959 DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics ISSN: 1672-0229 Impact factor: 7.691
Figure 1An overview of metagenomic screening approaches
A. Steps involved in the construction of a library from environmental metagenome. B. Agar plate activity screening. C. Microtiter plate screening. D. Microfluidics coupled with FACS. FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
Recent examples of functional screening strategies employed to obtain metagenome-derived biocatalysts
| Agar plate screening | Proteases | Phenotypical detection | 1% skim-milk | Goat skin | ||
| Agar plate screening | Proteases | Phenotypical detection | 1% skim-milk | Desert sands | ||
| Agar plate screening | Proteases | Phenotypical detection | AZCL-casein | Deciduous forest soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | Esterases | Phenotypical detection | 1% Tributyrin | Marine mud | ||
| Agar plate screening | Esterases | Phenotypical detection | X-caprylate | Vegetable soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | Esterases | Phenotypical detection | α-Naphtyl-acetate, fast blue RR | Salted shrimp | ||
| Agar plate screening | Esterases | Phenotypical detection | 1% Tributyrin | Alluvial soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | Esterases | Phenotypical detection | Dimethyl phthalate | Biofilm waste treatment plant | ||
| Agar plate screening | Lipase | Phenotypical detection | 1% Tributyrin | |||
| Agar plate screening | Lipase | Phenotypical detection | 1% Tributyrin | Marine sponge ( | ||
| Agar plate screening | Lipase | Phenotypical detection | 1% Tributyrin | Marine sponge ( | ||
| Agar plate screening | Lipase | Phenotypical detection | 1% Tributyrin | Biomass | ||
| Agar plate screening | Cellulase | Phenotypical detection | Carboxymethyl cellulose | Coral ( | ||
| Agar plate screening | Cellulase | Phenotypical detection | AZCL-HE-cellulase | Brown alga ( | Yeast, plasmid | |
| Agar plate screening | Starch hydrolyzing enzyme | Phenotypical detection | Starch, Lugol solution | Acid mine drainage | ||
| Agar plate screening | β-Glycosidases | Phenotypical detection | X-gal | Baltic Sea water | ||
| Agar plate screening | β-Glycosidases | Phenotypical detection | 4-Nitorphenyl-β- | Alkaline polluted soil (Guangxi) | ||
| Agar plate screening | β-Glycosidases | Phenotypical detection | AZCL-xylan, xyloglucan | Cow dung | ||
| Agar plate screening | Pectinases | Phenotypical detection | Pectin | Forest soil (Western Ghats, India) | ||
| Agar plate screening | Tannase | Phenotypical detection | X-caprylate | Cotton field soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | Nuclease | Heterologous complementation | Hydrogen peroxide | Soil (Joao, Brazil) | ||
| Agar plate screening | RNase H | Heterologous complementation | Leaf and branch compost | |||
| Agar plate screening | Dioxygenases | Phenotypical detection | Indole | Aromatic compounds polluted soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | Dioxygenases | Phenotypical detection | Catechol | Activated sludge | ||
| Agar plate screening | Di-chlorophenol hydroxylase | Phenotypical detection | 3,5-Dichlorocatehol | Polychlorinated biphenyl contaminated soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | Polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase | Heterologous complementation | Sandy loam surface soil | |||
| Agar plate screening | Laccase | Phenotypical detection | 2,6-DMP, | Mangrove soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | DNA polymerase | Heterologous complementation | Cold sensitive mutant strain | Glacial ice | ||
| Agar plate screening | Hydrogenase | Heterologous complementation | Freshwater enrichment | Not stated | ||
| Agar plate screening | Genes resistant to toxic elements | Phenotypical detection | pH 1.8 | Acidic water (Tinto river) | ||
| Agar plate screening | Genes resistant to toxic elements | Phenotypical detection | Different number of antibiotics | Human fecal | ||
| Agar plate screening | Genes resistant to toxic elements | Phenotypical detection | Different number of antibiotics | Soil | ||
| Agar plate screening | Genes resistant to toxic elements | Phenotypical detection | Several antibiotics | Dairy cow manure | ||
| Agar plate screening | Genes resistant to toxic elements | Phenotypical detection | Several antibiotics | Cheese food matrix | ||
| Agar plate screening | Genes resistant to toxic elements | Phenotypical detection | Chloride salts | Surface water (Mississippi River) | ||
| Agar plate screening | Genes resistant to toxic elements | Heterologous complementation | Acrylate | Wastewater treatment plant | ||
| Microtiter plate screening | Cellulase | Absorbance measurement | Dinitrophenol-cellobioside | Soil, Buffalo rumen, | ||
| Microtiter plate screening | Esterase | Absorbance measurement | Nitrophenyl acetate | Oil reservoir | Not stated, fosmid | |
| Microtiter plate screening | Plant polymer decomposing enzymes | Absorbance measurement | Multiple substrates | Leaf compost | ||
| Microtiter plate screening | Laccase, exochitinase, | Absorbance measurement | ABTS, methylumbelliferone | Forest soil (Morvan, France) | Not stated | |
| SIGEX-FACS | Aromatic hydrocarbon catabolic operons | Fluorescence | Benzoate, naphthalene | Ground water contaminated with crude oil | ||
| SIGEX-FACS | Transcriptional regulators | Fluorescence | Salicylate, | Ground water contaminated with crude oil | ||
| SIGEX-FACS | Aromatic hydrocarbon induced genes | Fluorescence | Salicylate | Soil contaminated with polyaromatic hydrocarbon | ||
| GESS-FACS | Phenol generating enzymes | Fluorescence | p-Nitrophenyl | Sea tidal flat sediments | ||
| GESS-FACS | Lipase, cellulase, | Fluorescence | p-Nitrophenyl acetate, | Ocean tidal flat sediment | ||
| GESS-FACS | Phosphatase | Fluorescence | p-Nitrophenyl phosphate | Ocean tidal flat sediments | ||
| GMD | Lipolytic enzymes | Fluorescence | Fluorescein dicaprylate | Soil ( | ||
| GMD, FACS | Screening for antibiotics | Fluorescence | 3 strains of | |||
| Microfluidics (water in oil droplets), FACS | Hydrolases | Fluorescence | Sulfate monoester | Variety of sources (soil, degraded plant material, cow rumen) | ||
Note: AZCL, azurine-cross-linked; AZCL-HE, azurine-cross-linked hydroxyl-ethylcellulose; DMP, dimethoxyphenol; ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonate); GESS, genetic enzyme screening system; GMD, gel micro-droplet; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; SIGEX, substrate induced gene expression; ARS, agriculture research service.