Literature DB >> 30508678

The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Andrea Bocincova1, Jeffrey S Johnson2.   

Abstract

Access to WM can be restricted on the basis of goal-relevant properties such as spatial location. However, the extent of voluntary control over which features of an attended multi-feature object are encoded and maintained in WM is debated. Some evidence suggests that attending to an object leads to obligatory storage of all of its features, whereas other evidence suggests that access to WM can be restricted to only goal-relevant features. Another possibility is that all features are initially encoded, but irrelevant features are removed from WM over time. To address these various possibilities, we used pattern classification of EEG signals to track the temporal evolution of representations reflecting the encoding and storage of task-relevant and irrelevant features in WM. In different blocks, participants remembered the orientation, color or both orientation and color of a colored, oriented grating. The color and orientation of the grating was randomly drawn from two distinct feature bins on each trial. To examine trial-specific activity reflecting storage of the object's features, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier was trained to classify what bin the stimulus features came from. Importantly, for orientation, the classifier produced reliably above-chance classification across the delay when orientation was task-relevant but not when it was task-irrelevant. Interestingly, orientation could be accurately classified on trials for which both orientation and color were remembered. Moreover, a separate measure corresponding to the probability of a feature belonging to the correct bin was significantly higher when orientation was task-relevant compared to task-irrelevant during encoding. Above-chance classification for color was only present during the initial 500 msec across all conditions. Our results suggest that although information about all of an object's features is present in the initial stimulus-evoked neural response, information about the task-irrelevant features is attenuated during stimulus encoding and is largely absent throughout the delay.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature binding; Support-vector machine classifier; Top-down control; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30508678      PMCID: PMC6358497          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  37 in total

1.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.

Authors:  K M O'Craven; P E Downing; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The spread of attention across features of a surface.

Authors:  Zachary Raymond Ernst; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color.

Authors:  Robert H Logie; James R Brockmole; Snehlata Jaswal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

6.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Adam C Riggall; Stephen M Emrich; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources.

Authors:  Louise Marshall; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Reactivation of latent working memories with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Joshua J LaRocque; Adam C Riggall; Olivia Gosseries; Michael J Starrett; Emma E Meyering; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Decoding attended information in short-term memory: an EEG study.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Klaus Oberauer; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  4 in total

1.  Exploring Information Flow from Posteromedial Cortex during Visuospatial Working Memory: A Magnetoencephalography Study.

Authors:  Erin Goddard; Erika W Contini; Muireann Irish
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  The nature of magnitude integration: Contextual interference versus active magnitude binding.

Authors:  Irene Togoli; Domenica Bueti; Michele Fornaciai
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

3.  Sequence structure organizes items in varied latent states of working memory neural network.

Authors:  Qiaoli Huang; Huihui Zhang; Huan Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Decoding chromaticity and luminance from patterns of EEG activity.

Authors:  David W Sutterer; Andrew J Coia; Vincent Sun; Steven K Shevell; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 4.016

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.