Literature DB >> 10524624

fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.

K M O'Craven1, P E Downing, N Kanwisher.   

Abstract

Contrasting theories of visual attention emphasize selection by spatial location, visual features (such as motion or colour) or whole objects. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test key predictions of the object-based theory, which proposes that pre-attentive mechanisms segment the visual array into discrete objects, groups, or surfaces, which serve as targets for visual attention. Subjects viewed stimuli consisting of a face transparently superimposed on a house, with one moving and the other stationary. In different conditions, subjects attended to the face, the house or the motion. The magnetic resonance signal from each subject's fusiform face area, parahippocampal place area and area MT/MST provided a measure of the processing of faces, houses and visual motion, respectively. Although all three attributes occupied the same location, attending to one attribute of an object (such as the motion of a moving face) enhanced the neural representation not only of that attribute but also of the other attribute of the same object (for example, the face), compared with attributes of the other object (for example, the house). These results cannot be explained by models in which attention selects locations or features, and provide physiological evidence that whole objects are selected even when only one visual attribute is relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10524624     DOI: 10.1038/44134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  224 in total

1.  Attention improves encoding of task-relevant features in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Janneke F M Jehee; Devin K Brady; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention.

Authors:  M A Schoenfeld; C Tempelmann; A Martinez; J-M Hopf; C Sattler; H-J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The dynamics of the spread of selective visual attention.

Authors:  Michael S Worden; John J Foxe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Don't think of a white bear: an fMRI investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task-switching paradigm.

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Alex O Holcombe; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

Review 8.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

9.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Role of fusiform and anterior temporal cortical areas in facial recognition.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.