Literature DB >> 27702811

Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory.

Joshua J LaRocque1,2, Adam C Riggall3, Stephen M Emrich4, Bradley R Postle2,3.   

Abstract

A long-standing assumption of cognitive neuroscience has been that working memory (WM) is accomplished by sustained, elevated neural activity. More recently, theories of WM have expanded this view by describing different attentional states in WM with differing activation levels. Several studies have used multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) data to study neural activity corresponding to these WM states. Intriguingly, no evidence was found for active neural representations for information held in WM outside the focus of attention ("unattended memory items," UMIs), suggesting that only attended memory items (AMIs) are accompanied by an active trace. However, these results depended on category-level decoding, which lacks sensitivity to neural representations of individual items. Therefore, we employed a WM task in which subjects remembered the directions of motion of two dot arrays, with a retrocue indicating which was relevant for an imminent memory probe (the AMI). This design allowed MVPA decoding of delay-period fMRI signal at the stimulus-item level, affording a more sensitive test of the neural representation of UMIs. Whereas evidence for the AMI was reliably high, evidence for the UMI dropped to baseline, consistent with the notion that different WM attentional states may have qualitatively different mechanisms of retention.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; multivariate pattern analysis; neural representations; short-term memory; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27702811      PMCID: PMC6059111          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  28 in total

1.  Category-specific cortical activity precedes retrieval during memory search.

Authors:  Sean M Polyn; Vaidehi S Natu; Jonathan D Cohen; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-24       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain.

Authors:  Yukiyasu Kamitani; Frank Tong
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-24       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; John T Serences; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The consequence of refreshing for access to nonselected items in young and older adults.

Authors:  Julie A Higgins; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

6.  Temporary activation of long-term memory supports working memory.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Decoding attended information in short-term memory: an EEG study.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Klaus Oberauer; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.

Authors:  Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-29

9.  Goal-dependent dissociation of visual and prefrontal cortices during working memory.

Authors:  Sue-Hyun Lee; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Multiple neural states of representation in short-term memory? It's a matter of attention.

Authors:  Joshua J Larocque; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  25 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Alpha-band oscillations track the retrieval of precise spatial representations from long-term memory.

Authors:  David W Sutterer; Joshua J Foster; John T Serences; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Overlapping and distinct contributions of stimulus location and of spatial context to nonspatial visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Andrew D Sheldon; Qing Yu; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Distinct neural substrates for visual short-term memory of actions.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Zhisen Urgolites; Justin Wood; Chuansheng Chen; Siyao Li; Antao Chen; Gui Xue
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Cortical specialization for attended versus unattended working memory.

Authors:  Thomas B Christophel; Polina Iamshchinina; Chang Yan; Carsten Allefeld; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Visual Memories Bypass Normalization.

Authors:  Ilona M Bloem; Yurika L Watanabe; Melissa M Kibbe; Sam Ling
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-29

8.  The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Andrew D Sheldon; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Parietal-Occipital Interactions Underlying Control- and Representation-Related Processes in Working Memory for Nonspatial Visual Features.

Authors:  Olivia Gosseries; Qing Yu; Joshua J LaRocque; Michael J Starrett; Nathan S Rose; Nelson Cowan; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.