Literature DB >> 36259675

The nature of magnitude integration: Contextual interference versus active magnitude binding.

Irene Togoli1,2, Domenica Bueti1,3, Michele Fornaciai1,4.   

Abstract

Magnitude dimensions such as duration and numerosity have been shown to systematically interact, biasing each other in a congruent fashion: the more numerous a set of items is, the longer it is perceived to last in time. This integration between dimensions plays an important role in defining how we perceive magnitude. So far, however, the nature of magnitude integration remains unclear. Is magnitude integration a contextual interference, occurring whenever different types of information are concurrently available in the visual field, or does it involve an active "binding" of the different dimensions of the same object? To address these possibilities, we measured the integration bias induced by numerosity on perceived duration, in two cases: with duration and numerosity conveyed by distinct stimuli, or by the same stimulus. We show that a congruent integration effect can be observed only when the two magnitudes belong to the same stimulus. Instead, when the two magnitudes are conveyed by distinct stimuli, we observed an opposite effect. These findings demonstrate for the first time that a congruent integration occurs only between the dimensions of the same stimulus, suggesting the involvement of an active mechanism integrating the different dimensions of the same object in a unified percept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36259675      PMCID: PMC9587468          DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.11.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.004


  33 in total

Review 1.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer.

Authors:  Bin Xuan; Daren Zhang; Sheng He; Xiangchuan Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates.

Authors:  David Burr; Arianna Tozzi; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  A Neural Correlate of Visual Feature Binding in Primate Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Mohsen Parto Dezfouli; Philipp Schwedhelm; Michael Wibral; Stefan Treue; Mohammad Reza Daliri; Moein Esghaei
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Topographic representations of object size and relationships with numerosity reveal generalized quantity processing in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Ben M Harvey; Alessio Fracasso; Natalia Petridou; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties.

Authors:  C M Gray; P König; A K Engel; W Singer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The specious interaction of time and numerosity perception.

Authors:  Irene Togoli; Michele Fornaciai; Domenica Bueti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  Spatiotopic perceptual maps in humans: evidence from motion adaptation.

Authors:  Marco Turi; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Adaptation decorrelates shape representations.

Authors:  Marcelo G Mattar; Maria Olkkonen; Russell A Epstein; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.