Literature DB >> 14709235

Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Ivan C Griffin1, Anna C Nobre.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated whether it is possible to orient selective spatial attention to internal representations held in working memory in a similar fashion to orienting to perceptual stimuli. In the first experiment, subjects were either cued to orient to a spatial location before a stimulus array was presented (pre-cue), cued to orient to a spatial location in working memory after the array was presented (retro-cue), or given no cueing information (neutral cue). The stimulus array consisted of four differently colored crosses, one in each quadrant. At the end of a trial, a colored cross (probe) was presented centrally, and subjects responded according to whether it had occurred in the array. There were equivalent patterns of behavioral costs and benefits of cueing for both pre-cues and retro-cues. A follow-up experiment used a peripheral probe stimulus requiring a decision about whether its color matched that of the item presented at the same location in the array. Replication of the behavioral costs and benefits of pre-cues and retro-cues in this experiment ruled out changes in response criteria as the only explanation for the effects. The third experiment used event-related potentials (ERPs) to compare the neural processes involved in orienting attention to a spatial location in an external versus an internal spatial representation. In this task, subjects responded according to whether a central probe stimulus occurred at the cued location in the array. There were both similarities and differences between ERPs to spatial cues toward a perception versus an internal spatial representation. Lateralized early posterior and later frontal negativities were observed for both pre- and retro-cues. Retro-cues also showed additional neural processes to be involved in orienting to an internal representation, including early effects over frontal electrodes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14709235     DOI: 10.1162/089892903322598139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  190 in total

1.  Does visual short-term memory have a high-capacity stage?

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect?

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

5.  Saccades elicit obligatory allocation of visual working memory.

Authors:  Na Shao; Jie Li; Rende Shui; Xiaojie Zheng; Jiangang Lu; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

6.  Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Klaus Oberauer; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Cortical localization of phase and amplitude dynamics predicting access to somatosensory awareness.

Authors:  Jonni Hirvonen; Satu Palva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space.

Authors:  Muhammet Ikbal Sahan; Tom Verguts; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Gilles Pourtois; Wim Fias
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

9.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

10.  The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.