Literature DB >> 34308840

Sequence structure organizes items in varied latent states of working memory neural network.

Qiaoli Huang1,2,3, Huihui Zhang1,2,3, Huan Luo1,2,3.   

Abstract

In memory experiences, events do not exist independently but are linked with each other via structure-based organization. Structure context largely influences memory behavior, but how it is implemented in the brain remains unknown. Here, we combined magnetoencephalogram (MEG) recordings, computational modeling, and impulse-response approaches to probe the latent states when subjects held a list of items in working memory (WM). We demonstrate that sequence context reorganizes WM items into distinct latent states, that is, being reactivated at different latencies during WM retention, and the reactivation profiles further correlate with recency behavior. In contrast, memorizing the same list of items without sequence task requirements weakens the recency effect and elicits comparable neural reactivations. Computational modeling further reveals a dominant function of sequence context, instead of passive memory decaying, in characterizing recency effect. Taken together, sequence structure context shapes the way WM items are stored in the human brain and essentially influences memory behavior.
© 2021, Huang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEG; backward reactivation; hidden state; human; neuroscience; recency effect; sequence structure; working memory

Year:  2021        PMID: 34308840      PMCID: PMC8328517          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  63 in total

1.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  A theory of working memory without consciousness or sustained activity.

Authors:  Darinka Trübutschek; Sébastien Marti; Andrés Ojeda; Jean-Rémi King; Yuanyuan Mi; Misha Tsodyks; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Synaptic theory of working memory.

Authors:  Gianluigi Mongillo; Omri Barak; Misha Tsodyks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Visual perception as retrospective Bayesian decoding from high- to low-level features.

Authors:  Stephanie Ding; Christopher J Cueva; Misha Tsodyks; Ning Qian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements.

Authors:  S Taulu; J Simola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Reconstructions of information in visual spatial working memory degrade with memory load.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Edward F Ester; John T Serences
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Context information supports serial dependence of multiple visual objects across memory episodes.

Authors:  Cora Fischer; Stefan Czoschke; Benjamin Peters; Benjamin Rahm; Jochen Kaiser; Christoph Bledowski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Multiple neural states of representation in short-term memory? It's a matter of attention.

Authors:  Joshua J Larocque; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sequence structure organizes items in varied latent states of working memory neural network.

Authors:  Qiaoli Huang; Huihui Zhang; Huan Luo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.