Literature DB >> 21264632

Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color.

Robert H Logie1, James R Brockmole, Snehlata Jaswal.   

Abstract

Three experiments used a change detection paradigm across a range of study-test intervals to address the respective contributions of location, shape, and color to the formation of bindings of features in sensory memory and visual short-term memory (VSTM). In Experiment 1, location was designated task irrelevant and was randomized between study and test displays. The task was to detect changes in the bindings between shape and color. In Experiments 2 and 3, shape and color, respectively, were task irrelevant and randomized, with bindings tested between location and color (Experiment 2) and location and shape (Experiment 3). At shorter study-test intervals, randomizing location was most disruptive, followed by shape and then color. At longer intervals, randomizing any task-irrelevant feature had no impact on change detection for bindings between features, and location had no special role. Results suggest that location is crucial for initial perceptual binding but loses that special status once representations are formed in VSTM, which operates according to different principles, than do visual attention and perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264632     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0001-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  35 in total

1.  Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; C Cinel; J Wolfe; A Olson; N Klempen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Preserved spatial memory over brief intervals in older adults.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; John X Zhang; Karen J Mitchell; Marcia K Johnson; Suzanne M Bloise; Julie A Higgins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-06

4.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  After-search--visual search by gaze shifts after input image vanishes.

Authors:  Li Zhaoping
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding.

Authors:  S W Keele; A Cohen; R Ivry; M Liotti; P Yee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding.

Authors:  M Fahle; C Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Do binding deficits account for age-related decline in visual working memory?

Authors:  James R Brockmole; Mario A Parra; Sergio Della Sala; Robert H Logie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

9.  Attentive Tracking Disrupts Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05
View more
  30 in total

1.  Flexibility in Visual Working Memory: Accurate Change Detection in the Face of Irrelevant Variations in Position.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-01-13

2.  The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Phonological similarity and orthographic similarity affect probed serial recall of Chinese characters.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Lin; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Yvonne C Lai; Denise H Wu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

4.  Overlapping and distinct contributions of stimulus location and of spatial context to nonspatial visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Ying Cai; Andrew D Sheldon; Qing Yu; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

6.  Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

7.  Attentional control and competition between episodic representations.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Anna Schubö; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-02

8.  Visual mental image generation does not overlap with visual short-term memory: a dual-task interference study.

Authors:  Gregoire Borst; Elaine Niven; Robert H Logie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

9.  Strategic trade-offs between quantity and quality in working memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Sarah M Cormiea; Anish Kanabar; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Christopher L Blume; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.