Literature DB >> 23420420

Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources.

Louise Marshall1, Paul M Bays.   

Abstract

Selective attention is often considered the "gateway" to visual working memory (VWM). However, the extent to which we can voluntarily control which of an object's features enter memory remains subject to debate. Recent research has converged on the concept of VWM as a limited commodity distributed between elements of a visual scene. Consequently, as memory load increases, the fidelity with which each visual feature is stored decreases. Here we used changes in recall precision to probe whether task-irrelevant features were encoded into VWM when individuals were asked to store specific feature dimensions. Recall precision for both color and orientation was significantly enhanced when task-irrelevant features were removed, but knowledge of which features would be probed provided no advantage over having to memorize both features of all items. Next, we assessed the effect an interpolated orientation-or color-matching task had on the resolution with which orientations in a memory array were stored. We found that the presence of orientation information in the second array disrupted memory of the first array. The cost to recall precision was identical whether the interfering features had to be remembered, attended to, or could be ignored. Therefore, it appears that storing, or merely attending to, one feature of an object is sufficient to promote automatic encoding of all its features, depleting VWM resources. However, the precision cost was abolished when the match task preceded the memory array. So, while encoding is automatic, maintenance is voluntary, allowing resources to be reallocated to store new visual information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420420      PMCID: PMC3587390          DOI: 10.1167/13.2.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  44 in total

1.  The neural fate of task-irrelevant features in object-based processing.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

4.  Visual short-term memory capacity for simple and complex objects.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Paola Sessa; Alex Gotler; Pierre Jolicoeur; Roberto Dell'Acqua
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Modulations in oscillatory activity with amplitude asymmetry can produce cognitively relevant event-related responses.

Authors:  Hanneke van Dijk; Jurrian van der Werf; Ali Mazaheri; W Pieter Medendorp; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-03-20

10.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  21 in total

1.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.

Authors:  Andrea Bocincova; Jeffrey S Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Does attribute amnesia occur with the presentation of complex, meaningful stimuli? The answer is, "it depends".

Authors:  Hui Chen; Jiahan Yu; Yingtao Fu; Ping Zhu; Wei Li; Jifan Zhou; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

4.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 5.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Visual short-term memory for oriented, colored objects.

Authors:  Hongsup Shin; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Using Interactive Data Visualizations for Exploratory Analysis in Undergraduate Genomics Coursework: Field Study Findings and Guidelines.

Authors:  Barbara Mirel; Anuj Kumar; Paige Nong; Gang Su; Fan Meng
Journal:  J Sci Educ Technol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.315

8.  Parallel temporal dynamics in hierarchical cognitive control.

Authors:  Carolyn Ranti; Christopher H Chatham; David Badre
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-04

9.  Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Shixian Yu; Chengfeng Zhu; Rende Shui; Xuchu Weng; Peng Li; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.