Literature DB >> 19922784

Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Deniz Başkent1, Cheryl L Eiler, Brent Edwards.   

Abstract

The auditory system is capable of perceptually restoring inaudible portions of speech. This restoration may be compromised as a result of hearing impairment, particularly if it is combined with advanced age, because of degradations in the bottom-up and top-down processes. To test this hypothesis, phonemic restoration was quantitatively measured with hearing-impaired listeners of varying ages and degrees of hearing impairment, as well as with a normal hearing control group. The results showed that the restoration benefit was negatively correlated with both hearing impairment and age, supporting the original hypothesis. Group data showed that listeners with mild hearing loss were able to perceptually restore the missing speech segments as well as listeners with normal hearing. By contrast, the moderately-impaired listeners showed no evidence of perceptual restoration. Further analysis using the articulation index showed that listeners with mild hearing loss were able to increase phonemic restoration with audibility. Moderately-impaired listeners, on the other hand, were unable to do so, even when the articulation index was high. The overall findings suggest that, in addition to insufficient audibility, degradations in the bottom-up and/or top-down mechanisms as a result of hearing loss may limit or entirely prevent phonemic restoration. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19922784     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  Phonemic restoration effect reversed in a reverberant room.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Recognition of interrupted sentences under conditions of spectral degradation.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Fabiola Peredo; Desirae Nelson; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The importance of a broad bandwidth for understanding "glimpsed" speech.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Lucas Baltzell; Jan Rennies; Mathieu Lavandier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Impact of peripheral hearing loss on top-down auditory processing.

Authors:  Alexandria M H Lesicko; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Spectro-temporal glimpsing of speech in noise: Regularity and coherence of masking patterns reduces uncertainty and increases intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Victoria A Sevich; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

10.  Perceptual learning of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Michel Ruben Benard; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.