Literature DB >> 33379934

The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Peter A Wasiuk1, Mathieu Lavandier2, Emily Buss3, Jacob Oleson4, Lauren Calandruccio1.   

Abstract

Older adults with hearing loss have greater difficulty recognizing target speech in multi-talker environments than young adults with normal hearing, especially when target and masker speech streams are perceptually similar. A difference in fundamental frequency (f0) contour depth is an effective stream segregation cue for young adults with normal hearing. This study examined whether older adults with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss are able to utilize differences in target/masker f0 contour depth to improve speech recognition in multi-talker listening. Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were measured for speech mixtures composed of target/masker streams with flat, normal, and exaggerated speaking styles, in which f0 contour depth systematically varied. Computational modeling estimated differences in energetic masking across listening conditions. Young adults had lower SRTs than older adults; a result that was partially explained by differences in audibility predicted by the model. However, audibility differences did not explain why young adults experienced a benefit from mismatched target/masker f0 contour depth, while in most conditions, older adults did not. Reduced ability to use segregation cues (differences in target/masker f0 contour depth), and deficits grouping speech with variable f0 contours likely contribute to difficulties experienced by older adults in challenging acoustic environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33379934      PMCID: PMC7863686          DOI: 10.1121/10.0002661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  79 in total

1.  Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context.

Authors:  M S Sommers; S M Danielson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1999-09

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.

Authors:  Nandini Iyer; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Koenraad S Rhebergen; Niek J Versfeld
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Measurement and prediction of speech and noise levels and the Lombard effect in eating establishments.

Authors:  Murray Hodgson; Gavin Steininger; Zohreh Razavi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  The Evolution of Statistical Methods in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson; Grant D Brown; Ryan McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Individual differences in speech intelligibility at a cocktail party: A modeling perspective.

Authors:  Mathieu Lavandier; Christine R Mason; Lucas S Baltzell; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.