Literature DB >> 35649892

Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users.

Brittany N Jaekel1, Sarah Weinstein1, Rochelle S Newman1, Matthew J Goupell1.   

Abstract

Cochlear-implant (CI) users have previously demonstrated perceptual restoration, or successful repair of noise-interrupted speech, using the interrupted sentences paradigm [Bhargava, Gaudrain, and Başkent (2014). "Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users," Hear. Res. 309, 113-123]. The perceptual restoration effect was defined experimentally as higher speech understanding scores with noise-burst interrupted sentences compared to silent-gap interrupted sentences. For the perceptual restoration illusion to occur, it is often necessary for the masking or interrupting noise bursts to have a higher intensity than the adjacent speech signal to be perceived as a plausible masker. Thus, signal processing factors like noise reduction algorithms and automatic gain control could have a negative impact on speech repair in this population. Surprisingly, evidence that participants with cochlear implants experienced the perceptual restoration illusion was not observed across the two planned experiments. A separate experiment, which aimed to provide a close replication of previous work on perceptual restoration in CI users, also found no consistent evidence of perceptual restoration, contrasting the original study's previously reported findings. Typical speech repair of interrupted sentences was not observed in the present work's sample of CI users, and signal-processing factors did not appear to affect speech repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35649892      PMCID: PMC9054268          DOI: 10.1121/10.0010258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  47 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlea-scaled spectral entropy predicts rate-invariant intelligibility of temporally distorted sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Michael Kiefte; Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Karen Taylor; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

4.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function.

Authors:  Richard C Gershon; Molly V Wagster; Hugh C Hendrie; Nathan A Fox; Karon F Cook; Cindy J Nowinski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Abnormal binaural spectral integration in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Rindy A Ito; Jessica L Eggleston; David R Wozny
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-24

7.  Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Lawrence J Revit
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; J Fitzke; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Access to semantic cues does not lead to perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Sarah Weinstein; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual restoration of degraded speech is preserved with advancing age.

Authors:  Jefta D Saija; Elkan G Akyürek; Tjeerd C Andringa; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.