Literature DB >> 35105039

Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.

Blythe Vickery1, Daniel Fogerty2, Judy R Dubno3.   

Abstract

This study investigated how age and hearing loss influence the misperceptions made when listening to sentences in babble. Open-set responses to final words in sentences with low and high context were analyzed for younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with normal or impaired hearing. All groups performed similarly in overall accuracy but differed in error type. Misperceptions for all groups were analyzed according to phonological and semantic properties. Comparisons between groups indicated that misperceptions for older adults were more influenced by phonological factors. Furthermore, older adults with hearing loss omitted more responses. Overall, across all groups, results suggest that phonological confusions most explain misperceptions in low context sentences. In high context sentences, the meaningful sentence context appears to provide predictive cues that reduce misperceptions. When misperceptions do occur, responses tend to have greater semantic similarity and lesser phonological similarity to the target, compared to low context sentences. In this way, semantic similarity may index a postdictive process by which ambiguities due to phonological confusions are resolved to conform to the semantic context of the sentence. These patterns demonstrate that context, age, and hearing loss affect the misperceptions, and potential sentence interpretation, made when listening to sentences in babble.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35105039      PMCID: PMC8807001          DOI: 10.1121/10.0009367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  65 in total

1.  Sentence recognition materials based on frequency of word use and lexical confusability.

Authors:  T S Bell; R H Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span.

Authors:  Denise C Park; Gary Lautenschlager; Trey Hedden; Natalie S Davidson; Anderson D Smith; Pamela K Smith
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-06

Review 3.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  The masking of speech.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-10

8.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.