Literature DB >> 35505617

Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Meisam K Arjmandi1,2,3, Kelly N Jahn1,2,4, Julie G Arenberg1,2,3.   

Abstract

Speech recognition outcomes are highly variable among pediatric and adult cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Although there is some evidence that the quality of the electrode-neuron interface (ENI) contributes to this large variability in auditory perception, its relationship with speech outcomes is not well understood. Single-channel auditory detection thresholds measured in response to focused electrical fields (i.e., focused thresholds) are sensitive to properties of ENI quality, including electrode-neuron distance, intracochlear resistance, and neural health. In the present study, focused thresholds and speech perception abilities were assessed in 15 children and 21 adult CI listeners. Focused thresholds were measured for all active electrodes using a fast sweep procedure. Speech perception performance was evaluated by assessing listeners' ability to identify vowels presented in /h-vowel-d/ context. Consistent with prior literature, focused thresholds were lower for children than for adults, but vowel identification did not differ significantly across age groups. Higher across-array average focused thresholds, which may indicate a relatively poor ENI quality, were associated with poorer vowel identification scores in both children and adults. Adult CI listeners with longer durations of deafness had higher focused thresholds. Findings from this study demonstrate that poor-quality ENIs may contribute to reduced speech outcomes for pediatric and adult CI listeners. Estimates of ENI quality (e.g., focused thresholds) may assist in developing customized programming interventions that serve to improve the transmission of spectral cues that are important in vowel identification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Electrode-neuron interface; Focused thresholds; Pediatric; Vowel identification

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35505617      PMCID: PMC9073113          DOI: 10.1177/23312165221095364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Hear        ISSN: 2331-2165            Impact factor:   3.496


  51 in total

1.  The effect of channel interactions on speech recognition in cochlear implant subjects: predictions from an acoustic model.

Authors:  Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Electrode impedance in adults and children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  P A Busby; K L Plant; L A Whitford
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2002-09

4.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

5.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Chadi A Makary; Jennifer Shin; Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-12

7.  Postimplantation changes of electrophysiological parameters in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrzej Molisz; Andrzej Zarowski; Annelies Vermeiren; Tinne Theunen; Liesbeth De Coninck; Janusz Siebert; Erwin F Offeciers
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Christine P Etlert; Sara O'Brient; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Comparison of signal and gap-detection thresholds for focused and broad cochlear implant electrode configurations.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John M Deeks; Alexander J Billig; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.