Literature DB >> 16520009

The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.

Jeroen J Briaire1, Johan H M Frijns.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant research endeavors to optimize the spatial selectivity, threshold and dynamic range with the objective of improving the speech perception performance of the implant user. One of the ways to achieve some of these goals is by electrode design. New cochlear implant electrode designs strive to bring the electrode contacts into close proximity to the nerve fibers in the modiolus: this is done by placing the contacts on the medial side of the array and positioning the implant against the medial wall of scala tympani. The question remains whether this is the optimal position for a cochlea with intact neural fibers and, if so, whether it is also true for a cochlea with degenerated neural fibers. In this study a computational model of the implanted human cochlea is used to investigate the optimal position of the array with respect to threshold, dynamic range and spatial selectivity for a cochlea with intact nerve fibers and for degenerated nerve fibers. In addition, the model is used to evaluate the predictive value of eCAP measurements for obtaining peri-operative information on the neural status. The model predicts improved threshold, dynamic range and spatial selectivity for the peri-modiolar position at the basal end of the cochlea, with minimal influence of neural degeneration. At the apical end of the array (1.5 cochlear turns), the dynamic range and the spatial selectivity are limited due to the occurrence of cross-turn stimulation, with the exception of the condition without neural degeneration and with the electrode array along the lateral wall of scala tympani. The eCAP simulations indicate that a large P(0) peak occurs before the N(1)P(1) complex when the fibers are not degenerated. The absence of this peak might be used as an indicator for neural degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16520009     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  34 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  On the parameters used in finite element modeling of compound peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Nicole A Pelot; Christina E Behrend; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

5.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jorien Snel-Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire; Erika H van der Veen; Randy K Kalkman; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-22

7.  Partial withdrawal of deeply inserted cochlear electrodes: observations of two patients.

Authors:  Maria-Izabel Kos; Colette Boex; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

9.  Ion channel noise can explain firing correlation in auditory nerves.

Authors:  Bahar Moezzi; Nicolangelo Iannella; Mark D McDonnell
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.