Literature DB >> 22423717

Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation.

Colette M McKay1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the psychophysical forward masking methods that have been used to investigate place specificity in cochlear implantees. These experiments are relevant for investigating whether the individual variability in outcomes for people using the same device can be explained by individual variations in frequency resolution or whether place specificity is affected by different modes of stimulation (such as bipolar, monopolar or tripolar) in the same person. Unfortunately, there has been no consensus about the methods used to derive electrical forward masking functions, or in the way that they are interpreted in relation to place specificity. Here, the different methods are critically examined to provide insight into the optimal methods that should be used to measure and interpret spatial forward masking functions in electric hearing. It is shown that, in order to separate the temporal effects of masking decay from the place-specificity information, different analyses of the functions are needed depending on whether a fixed-probe or fixed-masker method is employed. The effects of unit of measurement on specificity measures and the effects of subject listening strategy on the forward masked functions are also discussed.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22423717     DOI: 10.1121/1.3683248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hugh J McDermott; Brett A Swanson; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-06

2.  Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

5.  Symmetric Electrode Spanning Narrows the Excitation Patterns of Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

6.  Longitudinal effect of deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-17

8.  Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Amberly D Nye
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.