Literature DB >> 22104578

Understanding the deafened brain: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation.

D S Lazard1, A-L Giraud, D Gnansia, B Meyer, O Sterkers.   

Abstract

The cochlear implant (CI), by enabling oral communication in severely to profoundly deaf subjects, is one of the major medical advances over the last fifty years. Despite the globally very satisfactory results, individual outcomes vary considerably. The objective of this review is to describe the various factors influencing the results of CI rehabilitation with particular emphasis on the better understanding of neurocognitive mechanisms provided by functional brain imaging. The following aspects will be discussed: 1. Peripheral predictors such as the degree of preservation of nerve structures and the positioning of the electrode array. 2. The duration of auditory deprivation whose influence on brain reorganization is now becoming more clearly understood. 3. The age of initiation of hearing rehabilitation in subjects with pre-lingual deafness influencing the possibility of physiological maturation of nerve structures. 4. The concepts of sensitive period, decoupling and cross-modality. 5. In post-lingually deaf adults, brain plasticity can allow adaptation to the disability induced by deafness, subsequently potentiating CI rehabilitation, particularly as a result of audiovisual interactions. 6. Several studies provide concordant evidence that implanted patients present different phonological analysis and primary linguistic capacities. The results of CI rehabilitation are dependent on factors situated between the cochlea and cortical associative areas. The importance of higher cognitive influences on the functional results of cochlear implantation justify adaptation of coding strategies, as well as global cognitive management of deaf patients by utilising brain plasticity capacities.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22104578     DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2011.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis        ISSN: 1879-7296            Impact factor:   2.080


  18 in total

1.  Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant?

Authors:  Anne-Lise Hiel; Jean-Marc Gerard; Monique Decat; Naïma Deggouj
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

Review 3.  Auditory neuroimaging with fMRI and PET.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Joe Saliba; Heather Bortfeld; Daniel J Levitin; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Meta-Analytic Findings on Reading in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Fatima Sibaii; Kejin Lee; Makayla J Gill; Jonathan L Hatch
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

7.  Cognitive skills and reading in adults with Usher syndrome type 2.

Authors:  Cecilia Henricson; Björn Lidestam; Björn Lyxell; Claes Möller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-25

Review 8.  Cochlear implantation (CI) for prelingual deafness: the relevance of studies of brain organization and the role of first language acquisition in considering outcome success.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell; Mairéad MacSweeney; Bencie Woll
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Supplementary Effect of Choline Alfoscerate on Speech Recognition in Patients With Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Prospective Study in 34 Patients (57 Ears).

Authors:  Gina Na; Sang Hyun Kwak; Seung Hyun Jang; Hye Eun Noh; Jungghi Kim; SeungJoon Yang; Jinsei Jung
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 10.  Benefits and detriments of unilateral cochlear implant use on bilateral auditory development in children who are deaf.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.