Literature DB >> 29808466

A deep learning framework for segmentation and pose estimation of pedicle screw implants based on C-arm fluoroscopy.

Hooman Esfandiari1, Robyn Newell2, Carolyn Anglin3, John Street4, Antony J Hodgson5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pedicle screw fixation is a challenging procedure with a concerning rates of reoperation. After insertion of the screws is completed, the most common intraoperative verification approach is to acquire anterior-posterior and lateral radiographic images, based on which the surgeons try to visually assess the correctness of insertion. Given the limited accuracy of the existing verification techniques, we identified the need for an accurate and automated pedicle screw assessment system that can verify the screw insertion intraoperatively. For doing so, this paper offers a framework for automatic segmentation and pose estimation of pedicle screws based on deep learning principles.
METHODS: Segmentation of pedicle screw X-ray projections was performed by a convolutional neural network. The network could isolate the input X-rays into three classes: screw head, screw shaft and background. Once all the screw shafts were segmented, knowledge about the spatial configuration of the acquired biplanar X-rays was used to identify the correspondence between the projections. Pose estimation was then performed to estimate the 6 degree-of-freedom pose of each screw. The performance of the proposed pose estimation method was tested on a porcine specimen.
RESULTS: The developed machine learning framework was capable of segmenting the screw shafts with 93% and 83% accuracy when tested on synthetic X-rays and on clinically realistic X-rays, respectively. The pose estimation accuracy of this method was shown to be [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] on clinically realistic X-rays.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed system offers an accurate and fully automatic pedicle screw segmentation and pose assessment framework. Such a system can help to provide an intraoperative pedicle screw insertion assessment protocol with minimal interference with the existing surgical routines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Pedicle screw; Pose estimation; Segmentation; Surgical navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29808466     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1776-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  11 in total

Review 1.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  P Markelj; D Tomaževič; B Likar; F Pernuš
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Fully automated 2D-3D registration and verification.

Authors:  Andreas Varnavas; Tom Carrell; Graeme Penney
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Stepwise methodology for plain radiographic assessment of pedicle screw placement: a comparison with computed tomography.

Authors:  Theodore J Choma; Francis Denis; John E Lonstein; Joseph H Perra; James D Schwender; Timothy A Garvey; William J Mullin
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-12

4.  Accuracy of a new intraoperative cone beam CT imaging technique (Artis zeego II) compared to postoperative CT scan for assessment of pedicle screws placement and breaches detection.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques.

Authors:  Yasser Allam; J Silbermann; F Riese; R Greiner-Perth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.

Authors:  S D Gertzbein; S E Robbins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Nikolaos K Paschos; Emilios E Pakos; Angelos N Politis; Christina M Arnaoutoglou; Athanasios C Karageorgos; Avraam Ploumis; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Vincenzo Amato; Luigi Giannachi; Claudio Irace; Claudio Corona
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-03

9.  Intraoperative evaluation of device placement in spine surgery using known-component 3D-2D image registration.

Authors:  A Uneri; T De Silva; J Goerres; M W Jacobson; M D Ketcha; S Reaungamornrat; G Kleinszig; S Vogt; A J Khanna; G M Osgood; J-P Wolinsky; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Automatic localization of vertebral levels in x-ray fluoroscopy using 3D-2D registration: a tool to reduce wrong-site surgery.

Authors:  Y Otake; S Schafer; J W Stayman; W Zbijewski; G Kleinszig; R Graumann; A J Khanna; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  10 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of intensity-based 2D-3D registration for intraoperative use in pedicle screw insertion surgeries.

Authors:  Hooman Esfandiari; Carolyn Anglin; Pierre Guy; John Street; Simon Weidert; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  CAI4CAI: The Rise of Contextual Artificial Intelligence in Computer Assisted Interventions.

Authors:  Tom Vercauteren; Mathias Unberath; Nicolas Padoy; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 10.961

3.  Known-component metal artifact reduction (KC-MAR) for cone-beam CT.

Authors:  A Uneri; X Zhang; T Yi; J W Stayman; P A Helm; G M Osgood; N Theodore; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Current development and prospects of deep learning in spine image analysis: a literature review.

Authors:  Biao Qu; Jianpeng Cao; Chen Qian; Jinyu Wu; Jianzhong Lin; Liansheng Wang; Lin Ou-Yang; Yongfa Chen; Liyue Yan; Qing Hong; Gaofeng Zheng; Xiaobo Qu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility.

Authors:  Alexander L Hornung; Christopher M Hornung; G Michael Mallow; J Nicolás Barajas; Augustus Rush; Arash J Sayari; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Autonomous image segmentation and identification of anatomical landmarks from lumbar spine intraoperative computed tomography scans using machine learning: A validation study.

Authors:  Krzyzstof Siemionow; Cristian Luciano; Craig Forsthoefel; Suavi Aydogmus
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-06-05

Review 7.  A narrative review of machine learning as promising revolution in clinical practice of scoliosis.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xiao Zhai; Kaiqiang Sun; Haojue Wang; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

8.  Surgical Process Modeling for Open Spinal Surgeries.

Authors:  Fabio Carrillo; Hooman Esfandiari; Sandro Müller; Marco von Atzigen; Aidana Massalimova; Daniel Suter; Christoph J Laux; José M Spirig; Mazda Farshad; Philipp Fürnstahl
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 9.  Overview of Methods to Quantify Invasiveness of Surgical Approaches in Orthopedic Surgery-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Niels Buis; Hooman Esfandiari; Armando Hoch; Philipp Fürnstahl
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-26

10.  A Hybrid 3D-2D Image Registration Framework for Pedicle Screw Trajectory Registration between Intraoperative X-ray Image and Preoperative CT Image.

Authors:  Roshan Ramakrishna Naik; Anitha Hoblidar; Shyamasunder N Bhat; Nishanth Ampar; Raghuraj Kundangar
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-07-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.