Literature DB >> 28528479

Accuracy of a new intraoperative cone beam CT imaging technique (Artis zeego II) compared to postoperative CT scan for assessment of pedicle screws placement and breaches detection.

Virginie Cordemans1, Ludovic Kaminski2, Xavier Banse3,2, Bernard G Francq4, Olivier Cartiaux3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of a novel intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging technique with that of conventional computed tomography (CT) scans for assessment of pedicle screw placement and breach detection.
METHODS: Three hundred and forty-eight pedicle screws were inserted in 58 patients between October 2013 and March 2016. All patients had an intraoperative CBCT scan and a conventional CT scan to verify the placement of the screws. The CBCT and CT images were reviewed by two surgeons to assess the accuracy of screw placement and detect pedicle breaches using two established classification systems. Agreement on screw placement between intraoperative CBCT and postoperative CT was assessed using Kappa and Gwet's coefficients. Using CT scanning as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to determine the ability of CBCT imaging to accurately evaluate screw placement.
RESULTS: The Kappa coefficient was 0.78 using the Gertzbein classification and 0.80 using the Heary classification, indicating a substantial agreement between the intraoperative CBCT and postoperative CT images. Gwet's coefficient was 0.94 for both classifications, indicating almost perfect agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the CBCT images were 77, 98, 86, and 96%, respectively, for the Gertzbein classification and 79, 98, 88, and 96%, respectively, for the Heary classification.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative CBCT provides accurate assessment of pedicle screw placement and enables intraoperative repositioning of misplaced screws. This technique may make postoperative CT imaging unnecessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Computed tomography scanner (CT scan); Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); Intraoperative breach detection; Pedicle screws assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528479     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5139-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  Probing for thoracic pedicle screw tract violation(s): is it valid?

Authors:  Ronald A Lehman; Benjamin K Potter; Timothy R Kuklo; Audrey S Chang; David W Polly; Scott B Shawen; Joseph R Orchowski
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-08

Review 2.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

3.  Routine spinal navigation for thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw insertion using the O-arm three-dimensional imaging system improves placement accuracy.

Authors:  Ji Min Ling; Shree Kumar Dinesh; Boon Chuan Pang; Min Wei Chen; Heng Lip Lim; Danny T Louange; Chun Sing Yu; Chee Meng Ernest Wang
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Guidelines for patient radiation dose management.

Authors:  Michael S Stecker; Stephen Balter; Richard B Towbin; Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; J Fritz Angle; Christine P Chao; Alan M Cohen; Robert G Dixon; Kathleen Gross; George G Hartnell; Beth Schueler; John D Statler; Thierry de Baère; John F Cardella
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Is in vivo manual palpation for thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation reliable?

Authors:  Miriam L Donohue; Ross R Moquin; Amit Singla; Blair Calancie
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-02-21

6.  Spinal pedicle fixation. Confirmation of an image-based technique for screw placement.

Authors:  J C Steinmann; H N Herkowitz; H el-Kommos; D P Wesolowski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Does intraoperative navigation improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the apical region of dystrophic scoliosis secondary to neurofibromatosis type I: comparison between O-arm navigation and free-hand technique.

Authors:  Mengran Jin; Zhen Liu; Xingyong Liu; Huang Yan; Xiao Han; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view.

Authors:  N Boos; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Imaging assessment of lumbar pedicle screw placement: sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographs and computer axial tomography.

Authors:  Dahari Brooks; Mark Eskander; Steve Balsis; Nat Ordway; Patrick Connolly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging (O-arm) for assessment of pedicle screw position: Does it prevent unacceptable screw placement?

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; David W Polly; Charles Gerald T Ledonio; Edward Rainier G Santos
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy in terms of breach and reposition using a new intraoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging technique and evaluation of the factors associated with these parameters of accuracy: a series of 695 screws.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Christine Detrembleur; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A comparative analysis of intensity-based 2D-3D registration for intraoperative use in pedicle screw insertion surgeries.

Authors:  Hooman Esfandiari; Carolyn Anglin; Pierre Guy; John Street; Simon Weidert; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw versus conventional pedicle screw for extra-pedicular screw placement in dysplastic pedicles without cancellous channel in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computerized tomography (CT) analysis.

Authors:  Chee Kean Lee; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Siti Mariam Abd Gani; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of pedicle screw placement accuracy between two types of imaging support (Artis Zeego versus two-dimensional fluoroscopy): a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Akira Matsuoka; Tomoaki Toyone; Ichiro Okano; Yoshifumi Kudo; Koji Ishikawa; Hiroshi Maruyama; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Toshiyuki Shirahata; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  A deep learning framework for segmentation and pose estimation of pedicle screw implants based on C-arm fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Hooman Esfandiari; Robyn Newell; Carolyn Anglin; John Street; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Nutrient foramen location on the laminae provides a landmark for pedicle screw entry: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Masahito Oshina; Yasushi Oshima; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Yuki Taniguchi; Hirotaka Chikuda; Kiehyun Daniel Riew; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Curved periacetabular osteotomy using intraoperative real-time 3-dimensional computed tomography with a robotic C-arm system: A case report.

Authors:  Ariha Goshi; Shigeo Fukunishi; Shohei Okahisa; Taishi Okada; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Intraoperative 3D imaging with cone-beam computed tomography leads to revision of pedicle screws in dorsal instrumentation: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Felix Zimmermann; Katharina Kohl; Maxim Privalov; Jochen Franke; Sven Y Vetter
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.