Literature DB >> 21901328

Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.

Ioannis D Gelalis1, Nikolaos K Paschos, Emilios E Pakos, Angelos N Politis, Christina M Arnaoutoglou, Athanasios C Karageorgos, Avraam Ploumis, Theodoros A Xenakis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With the advances and improvement of computer-assisted surgery devices, computer-guided pedicle screws insertion has been applied to the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review of all available prospective evidence regarding pedicle screw insertion techniques in the thoracic and lumbar human spine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered all prospective in vivo clinical studies in the English literature that assessed the results of different pedicle screw placement techniques (free-hand technique, fluoroscopy guided, computed tomography (CT)-based navigation, fluoro-based navigation). MEDLINE, OVID, and Springer databases were used for the literature search covering the period from January 1950 until May 2010.
RESULTS: 26 prospective clinical studies were eventually included in the analysis. These studies included in total 1,105 patients in which 6,617 screws were inserted. In the studies using free-hand technique, the percentage of the screws fully contained in the pedicle ranged from 69 to 94%, with the aid of fluoroscopy from 28 to 85%, using CT navigation from 89 to 100% and using fluoroscopy-based navigation from 81 to 92%. The screws positioned with free-hand technique tended to perforate the cortex medially, whereas the screws placed with CT navigation guidance seemed to perforate more often laterally.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, navigation does indeed exhibit higher accuracy and increased safety in pedicle screw placement than free-hand technique and use of fluoroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21901328      PMCID: PMC3265579          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2011-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  45 in total

1.  Fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw placement through a mature fusion mass: an assessment of 24 consecutive cases with independent analysis of computed tomography and clinical data.

Authors:  Yoga Raja Rampersaud; Kwang-Soo Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery.

Authors:  P Merloz; J Troccaz; H Vouaillat; C Vasile; J Tonetti; A Eid; S Plaweski
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 4.  Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Rajeev Verma; Sonal Krishan; Kurt Haendlmayer; A Mohsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Markus Beck; Thomas Mittlmeier; Philip Gierer; Christoph Harms; Georg Gradl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients.

Authors:  T Laine; K Mäkitalo; D Schlenzka; K Tallroth; M Poussa; A Alho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is it warranted?

Authors:  C L Hamill; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; M P Chapman; K Blanke; C Baldus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

Authors:  L P Amiot; K Lang; M Putzier; H Zippel; H Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance.

Authors:  F P Girardi; F P Cammisa; H S Sandhu; L Alvarez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

10.  Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation of pedicle screw insertion: an in vivo feasibility study.

Authors:  Tsai-Sheng Fu; Li-Huei Chen; Chak-Bor Wong; Po-Liang Lai; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Chi-Chieh Niu; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-12
View more
  145 in total

1.  [Handling modern imaging procedures in a high-tech operating room].

Authors:  T Hüfner; M Citak; J Imrecke; C Krettek; T Stübig
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kleck; Ian Cullilmore; Matthew LaFleur; Emily Lindley; Mark E Rentschler; Evalina L Burger; Christopher M J Cain; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Riccardo Cecchinato; Zsolt Fekete; Alberto Lipari; Meinrad Fiechter; P Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Interest of intra-operative 3D imaging in spine surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Sébastien Ruatti; C Dubois; E Chipon; G Kerschbaumer; M Milaire; A Moreau-Gaudry; J Tonetti; Ph Merloz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Meng; Xiao-Fei Guan; Hai-Long Zhang; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  [Spinal column: implants and revisions].

Authors:  S M Krieg; H S Meyer; B Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

8.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy in terms of breach and reposition using a new intraoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging technique and evaluation of the factors associated with these parameters of accuracy: a series of 695 screws.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Christine Detrembleur; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Henning Windhagen; Christian Krettek; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Portable CT scanner-based navigation in lumbar pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Pavel Barsa; Petr Suchomel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.