Literature DB >> 35347425

Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility.

Alexander L Hornung1, Christopher M Hornung2, G Michael Mallow1, J Nicolás Barajas1, Augustus Rush1, Arash J Sayari1, Fabio Galbusera3, Hans-Joachim Wilke4, Matthew Colman1, Frank M Phillips1, Howard S An1, Dino Samartzis5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The field of artificial intelligence is ever growing and the applications of machine learning in spine care are continuously advancing. Given the advent of the intelligence-based spine care model, understanding the evolution of computation as it applies to diagnosis, treatment, and adverse event prediction is of great importance. Therefore, the current review sought to synthesize findings from the literature at the interface of artificial intelligence and spine research.
METHODS: A narrative review was performed based on the literature of three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus) from January 2015 to March 2021 that examined historical and recent advancements in the understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine research. Studies were appraised for their role in, or description of, advancements within image recognition and predictive modeling for spinal research. Only English articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria were ultimately incorporated in this review.
RESULTS: This review briefly summarizes the history and applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine. Three basic machine learning training paradigms: supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforced learning are also discussed. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have been utilized in almost every facet of spine ranging from localization and segmentation techniques in spinal imaging to pathology specific algorithms which include but not limited to; preoperative risk assessment of postoperative complications, screening algorithms for patients at risk of osteoporosis and clustering analysis to identify subgroups within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The future of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine surgery is also discussed with focusing on novel algorithms, data collection techniques and increased utilization of automated systems.
CONCLUSION: Improvements to modern-day computing and accessibility to various imaging modalities allow for innovative discoveries that may arise, for example, from management. Given the imminent future of AI in spine surgery, it is of great importance that practitioners continue to inform themselves regarding AI, its goals, use, and progression. In the future, it will be critical for the spine specialist to be able to discern the utility of novel AI research, particularly as it continues to pervade facets of everyday spine surgery.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Clinical utility; Machine learning; Neural network; Research; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35347425     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07176-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  79 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.

Authors:  Jürgen Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2014-10-13

2.  What Are the Applications and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Fracture Detection and Classification in Orthopaedic Trauma Imaging? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David W G Langerhuizen; Stein J Janssen; Wouter H Mallee; Michel P J van den Bekerom; David Ring; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Job N Doornberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Construct validation of machine learning in the prediction of short-term postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anirudh K Gowd; Avinesh Agarwalla; Nirav H Amin; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson; Nikhil N Verma; Joseph N Liu
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Artificial Intelligence Based Hierarchical Clustering of Patient Types and Intervention Categories in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Towards a New Classification Scheme that Predicts Quality and Value.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Justin S Smith; Ferran Pellisé; Michael Kelly; Ahmet Alanay; Emre Acaroğlu; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Ibrahim Obeid; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Christopher I Shaffrey; Douglas Burton; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Christopher I Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Miquel Serra-Burriel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis-Experience from the LSOS study cohort.

Authors:  Florian A Huber; Shanon Stutz; Ilaria Vittoria de Martini; Manoj Mannil; Anton S Becker; Sebastian Winklhofer; Jakob M Burgstaller; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Alexander Meyer; Dina Zverinski; Boris Pfahringer; Jörg Kempfert; Titus Kuehne; Simon H Sündermann; Christof Stamm; Thomas Hofmann; Volkmar Falk; Carsten Eickhoff
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 30.700

7.  Etiology-Based Classification of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Spine Fusion.

Authors:  Philip K Louie; Garrett K Harada; Arash J Sayari; Benjamin C Mayo; Jannat M Khan; Arya G Varthi; Alem Yacob; Dino Samartzis; Howard S An
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-10-30

8.  Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics.

Authors:  Saqib Ejaz Awan; Mohammed Bennamoun; Ferdous Sohel; Frank Mario Sanfilippo; Girish Dwivedi
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-02-27

Review 9.  Imaging in Spine Surgery: Current Concepts and Future Directions.

Authors:  Garrett K Harada; Zakariah K Siyaji; Sadaf Younis; Philip K Louie; Dino Samartzis; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-11-01

10.  Artificial Intelligence for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Rushikesh S Joshi; Alexander F Haddad; Darryl Lau; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-12-31
View more
  2 in total

1.  Answer to the letter to the editor by Zhi-Hui Dai concerning "Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion" by Rudisill SS et al. (Eur Spine J [2022]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07238-3).

Authors:  Samuel S Rudisill; Alexander L Hornung; J Nicolás Barajas; Jack J Bridge; G Michael Mallow; Wylie Lopez; Arash J Sayari; Philip K Louie; Garrett K Harada; Youping Tao; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew W Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Can We Make Spine Surgery Safer and Better?

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza Ramos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.