PURPOSE: The field of artificial intelligence is ever growing and the applications of machine learning in spine care are continuously advancing. Given the advent of the intelligence-based spine care model, understanding the evolution of computation as it applies to diagnosis, treatment, and adverse event prediction is of great importance. Therefore, the current review sought to synthesize findings from the literature at the interface of artificial intelligence and spine research. METHODS: A narrative review was performed based on the literature of three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus) from January 2015 to March 2021 that examined historical and recent advancements in the understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine research. Studies were appraised for their role in, or description of, advancements within image recognition and predictive modeling for spinal research. Only English articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria were ultimately incorporated in this review. RESULTS: This review briefly summarizes the history and applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine. Three basic machine learning training paradigms: supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforced learning are also discussed. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have been utilized in almost every facet of spine ranging from localization and segmentation techniques in spinal imaging to pathology specific algorithms which include but not limited to; preoperative risk assessment of postoperative complications, screening algorithms for patients at risk of osteoporosis and clustering analysis to identify subgroups within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The future of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine surgery is also discussed with focusing on novel algorithms, data collection techniques and increased utilization of automated systems. CONCLUSION: Improvements to modern-day computing and accessibility to various imaging modalities allow for innovative discoveries that may arise, for example, from management. Given the imminent future of AI in spine surgery, it is of great importance that practitioners continue to inform themselves regarding AI, its goals, use, and progression. In the future, it will be critical for the spine specialist to be able to discern the utility of novel AI research, particularly as it continues to pervade facets of everyday spine surgery.
PURPOSE: The field of artificial intelligence is ever growing and the applications of machine learning in spine care are continuously advancing. Given the advent of the intelligence-based spine care model, understanding the evolution of computation as it applies to diagnosis, treatment, and adverse event prediction is of great importance. Therefore, the current review sought to synthesize findings from the literature at the interface of artificial intelligence and spine research. METHODS: A narrative review was performed based on the literature of three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus) from January 2015 to March 2021 that examined historical and recent advancements in the understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine research. Studies were appraised for their role in, or description of, advancements within image recognition and predictive modeling for spinal research. Only English articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria were ultimately incorporated in this review. RESULTS: This review briefly summarizes the history and applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine. Three basic machine learning training paradigms: supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforced learning are also discussed. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have been utilized in almost every facet of spine ranging from localization and segmentation techniques in spinal imaging to pathology specific algorithms which include but not limited to; preoperative risk assessment of postoperative complications, screening algorithms for patients at risk of osteoporosis and clustering analysis to identify subgroups within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The future of artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine surgery is also discussed with focusing on novel algorithms, data collection techniques and increased utilization of automated systems. CONCLUSION: Improvements to modern-day computing and accessibility to various imaging modalities allow for innovative discoveries that may arise, for example, from management. Given the imminent future of AI in spine surgery, it is of great importance that practitioners continue to inform themselves regarding AI, its goals, use, and progression. In the future, it will be critical for the spine specialist to be able to discern the utility of novel AI research, particularly as it continues to pervade facets of everyday spine surgery.
Authors: David W G Langerhuizen; Stein J Janssen; Wouter H Mallee; Michel P J van den Bekerom; David Ring; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Job N Doornberg Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Anirudh K Gowd; Avinesh Agarwalla; Nirav H Amin; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson; Nikhil N Verma; Joseph N Liu Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2019-08-03 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Christopher P Ames; Justin S Smith; Ferran Pellisé; Michael Kelly; Ahmet Alanay; Emre Acaroğlu; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Ibrahim Obeid; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Christopher I Shaffrey; Douglas Burton; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Christopher I Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Miquel Serra-Burriel Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Florian A Huber; Shanon Stutz; Ilaria Vittoria de Martini; Manoj Mannil; Anton S Becker; Sebastian Winklhofer; Jakob M Burgstaller; Roman Guggenberger Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Alexander Meyer; Dina Zverinski; Boris Pfahringer; Jörg Kempfert; Titus Kuehne; Simon H Sündermann; Christof Stamm; Thomas Hofmann; Volkmar Falk; Carsten Eickhoff Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Philip K Louie; Garrett K Harada; Arash J Sayari; Benjamin C Mayo; Jannat M Khan; Arya G Varthi; Alem Yacob; Dino Samartzis; Howard S An Journal: HSS J Date: 2019-10-30
Authors: Samuel S Rudisill; Alexander L Hornung; J Nicolás Barajas; Jack J Bridge; G Michael Mallow; Wylie Lopez; Arash J Sayari; Philip K Louie; Garrett K Harada; Youping Tao; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew W Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 2.721