Literature DB >> 26387052

Fully automated 2D-3D registration and verification.

Andreas Varnavas1, Tom Carrell2, Graeme Penney3.   

Abstract

Clinical application of 2D-3D registration technology often requires a significant amount of human interaction during initialisation and result verification. This is one of the main barriers to more widespread clinical use of this technology. We propose novel techniques for automated initial pose estimation of the 3D data and verification of the registration result, and show how these techniques can be combined to enable fully automated 2D-3D registration, particularly in the case of a vertebra based system. The initialisation method is based on preoperative computation of 2D templates over a wide range of 3D poses. These templates are used to apply the Generalised Hough Transform to the intraoperative 2D image and the sought 3D pose is selected with the combined use of the generated accumulator arrays and a Gradient Difference Similarity Measure. On the verification side, two algorithms are proposed: one using normalised features based on the similarity value and the other based on the pose agreement between multiple vertebra based registrations. The proposed methods are employed here for CT to fluoroscopy registration and are trained and tested with data from 31 clinical procedures with 417 low dose, i.e. low quality, high noise interventional fluoroscopy images. When similarity value based verification is used, the fully automated system achieves a 95.73% correct registration rate, whereas a no registration result is produced for the remaining 4.27% of cases (i.e. incorrect registration rate is 0%). The system also automatically detects input images outside its operating range.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D–3D Registration; Hough transform; Registration verification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26387052     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  10 in total

1.  Computer-assisted intra-operative verification of surgical outcome for the treatment of syndesmotic injuries through contralateral side comparison.

Authors:  Sarina Thomas; Fabian Isensee; Simon Kohl; Maxim Privalov; Nils Beisemann; Benedict Swartman; Holger Keil; Sven Y Vetter; Jochen Franke; Paul A Grützner; Lena Maier-Hein; Marco Nolden; Klaus Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A comparative analysis of intensity-based 2D-3D registration for intraoperative use in pedicle screw insertion surgeries.

Authors:  Hooman Esfandiari; Carolyn Anglin; Pierre Guy; John Street; Simon Weidert; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Intraoperative Imaging and Image Fusion for Venous Interventions.

Authors:  Ponraj Chinnadurai; Jean Bismuth
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

4.  Intraoperative application of hand-held structured light scanning: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Brandon Chan; Jason Auyeung; John F Rudan; Randy E Ellis; Manuela Kunz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Pose-aware C-arm for automatic re-initialization of interventional 2D/3D image registration.

Authors:  Javad Fotouhi; Bernhard Fuerst; Alex Johnson; Sing Chun Lee; Russell Taylor; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Multi-stage 3D-2D registration for correction of anatomical deformation in image-guided spine surgery.

Authors:  M D Ketcha; T De Silva; A Uneri; M W Jacobson; J Goerres; G Kleinszig; S Vogt; J-P Wolinsky; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Realistic C-arm to pCT registration for vertebral localization in spine surgery : A hybrid 3D-2D registration framework for intraoperative vertebral pose estimation.

Authors:  Roshan Ramakrishna Naik; Shyamasunder N Bhat; Nishanth Ampar; Raghuraj Kundangar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  A deep learning framework for segmentation and pose estimation of pedicle screw implants based on C-arm fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Hooman Esfandiari; Robyn Newell; Carolyn Anglin; John Street; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Automatic landmark detection and mapping for 2D/3D registration with BoneNet.

Authors:  Van Nguyen; Luis F Alves Pereira; Zhihua Liang; Falk Mielke; Jeroen Van Houtte; Jan Sijbers; Jan De Beenhouwer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

10.  Image Fusion During Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair, to Fuse or Not to Fuse? A Meta-analysis and Additional Data From a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Sabrina A N Doelare; Stefan P M Smorenburg; Theodorus G van Schaik; Jan D Blankensteijn; Willem Wisselink; Johanna H Nederhoed; Rutger J Lely; Arjan W J Hoksbergen; Kak Khee Yeung
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.487

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.