| Literature DB >> 29789594 |
Yi Wu1,2,3, Rui-Ying Zhu1,2, Leslie A Mitchell3, Lu Ma1,2, Rui Liu1,2, Meng Zhao1,2,3, Bin Jia1,2, Hui Xu1,2, Yun-Xiang Li1,2, Zu-Ming Yang1,2, Yuan Ma1,2, Xia Li1,2, Hong Liu1,2, Duo Liu1,2, Wen-Hai Xiao1,2, Xiao Zhou1,2, Bing-Zhi Li1,2, Ying-Jin Yuan1,2, Jef D Boeke4.
Abstract
The power of synthetic biology has enabled the expression of heterologous pathways in cells, as well as genome-scale synthesis projects. The complexity of biological networks makes rational de novo design a grand challenge. Introducing features that confer genetic flexibility is a powerful strategy for downstream engineering. Here we develop an in vitro method of DNA library construction based on structural variation to accomplish this goal. The "in vitro SCRaMbLE system" uses Cre recombinase mixed in a test tube with purified DNA encoding multiple loxPsym sites. Using a β-carotene pathway designed for expression in yeast as an example, we demonstrate top-down and bottom-up in vitro SCRaMbLE, enabling optimization of biosynthetic pathway flux via the rearrangement of relevant transcription units. We show that our system provides a straightforward way to correlate phenotype and genotype and is potentially amenable to biochemical optimization in ways that the in vivo system cannot achieve.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29789594 PMCID: PMC5964173 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03743-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Top-down in vitro SCRaMbLE. a Schematic of top-down in vitro SCRaMbLE. Green diamonds represent the 34 bp loxPsym site. b Sequence comparison between loxPsym and loxP sites. c Gel electrophoresis analysis of an in vitro SCRaMbLEd library. The parental construct encoded 10 loxPsym sites with an inter-site distance of 500 bp. Material for linearization with NotI was extracted from a pool of E. coli colonies carrying the SCRaMbLEd DNA. d Map of pLM495. LoxPsym sites flank the β-carotene pathway genes crtE, crtI, crtYB, and tHMG1. Transcription units for these genes are pTIP1-crtE-tACS2, pPGK1-crtI-tASC1, pTDH3-crtYB-tCIT1, pZEO1-tHMG1-tACS2. e A total of 94 unique pathway structures were determined by PacBio sequencing of a SCRaMbLEd pLM495 library. f Yeast colonies transformed with in vitro SCRaMbLEd pLM495. The magnified region shows different colony colors, consistent with production of colored carotenoid intermediates. Synthetic complete medium lacking uracil (SC–Ura) medium was used to select transformants
Fig. 2Genotype–phenotype analysis of top-down in vitro SCRaMbLEd strains. The colony pictures were taken after 3 days incubation on SC–Ura medium. Strains derive from the experiment in Fig. 1f. The pathway structures of 17 SCRaMbLEd strains were verified by PCR analysis (Supplementary Fig. 6) and Sanger sequencing of the recovered yeast plasmids. The production of β-carotene was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Supplementary Fig. 7). Error bars represent standard deviation from three replicates
Fig. 3Bottom-up in vitro SCRaMbLE. a Schematic of two independent bottom-up in vitro SCRaMbLE strategies. Left panel—donor fragments each carry a TU and a URA3 gene. The acceptor vector encodes two loxPsym sites (green diamond). Right panel—a loxPsym site is inserted in frame with the URA3 coding sequence (Supplementary Fig. 10). Donor fragments are flanked by loxPsym sites. In both cases, the acceptor vector and the pool of donor TUs constructs are mixed with Cre recombinase in vitro. The donor TUs will be randomly inserted into loxPsym sites of the acceptor vector. Note that in bottom-up SCRaMbLE the core β-carotene pathway itself is not in a SCRaMbLE format (i.e., unlike “top down”, there are no lox sites flanking core pathway genes). (yellow box “NonSCRaMbLEable pathway” integrated into genome). Transcription unit (TU), HIS3 auxotroph marker (H), URA3 auxotroph marker (U). b Overview of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway in S. cerevisiae. Genes shown in black are endogenous to S. cerevisiae. Genes shown in red are non-native, and derive from X. dendrorhous (crtE, crtYB, crtI), and one from S. cerevisiae (truncated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase gene [tHMG1]). c Yeast colonies transformed with bottom-up in vitro SCRaMbLEd candidate carotenogenic TU pools. The non-SCRaMbLE sample was transformed with the acceptor vector as a control. Three other in vitro SCRaMbLEd pools consisted of endogenous TUs, exogenous TUs, and endogenous + exogenous TUs as indicated. d The efficiency of bottom-up in vitro SCRaMbLE (strategy 1). Different mole ratios of acceptor vector with donor TUs (1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:100) were used to test SCRaMbLE efficiency. pYW0113 was used as the acceptor vector; crtI TU and tHMG1 TU were used as donor fragments. A total of 100 yeast colonies for each group were tested using long fragment PCR and restriction enzyme digestion of recovered plasmids
Fig. 4Bottom-up in vitro SCRaMbLE for β-carotene pathway optimization. a Phenotype–genotype correlation of the β-carotene pathway after bottom-up in vitro SCRaMbLE (strategy 1). A total of 17 SCRaMbLEd yeast strains were isolated for testing colony color and determination of SCRaMbLEd construct sequences. The pictures of yeast color for both SCRaMbLEd strains and strains with re-introduced SCRaMbLEd plasmid were taken after 3 days incubation at 30 °C on SC–Ura medium. The SCRaMbLEd pathway structure was initially analyzed by restriction enzyme digestion to check the number of insertions and PCR analysis to evaluate which genes were inserted. Primer walking sequencing was applied to verify the sequence of all recovered plasmids. yYW0339 with only a URA3 gene inserted was used as a control strain. b HPLC measurement of carotenoid production for SCRaMbLEd yeast strains. Quantification was performed in biological triplicate for each strain as shown. Error bars represent standard deviation from three replicates