Literature DB >> 21918511

Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design.

Jessica S Dymond1, Sarah M Richardson, Candice E Coombes, Timothy Babatz, Héloïse Muller, Narayana Annaluru, William J Blake, Joy W Schwerzmann, Junbiao Dai, Derek L Lindstrom, Annabel C Boeke, Daniel E Gottschling, Srinivasan Chandrasegaran, Joel S Bader, Jef D Boeke.   

Abstract

Recent advances in DNA synthesis technology have enabled the construction of novel genetic pathways and genomic elements, furthering our understanding of system-level phenomena. The ability to synthesize large segments of DNA allows the engineering of pathways and genomes according to arbitrary sets of design principles. Here we describe a synthetic yeast genome project, Sc2.0, and the first partially synthetic eukaryotic chromosomes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome synIXR, and semi-synVIL. We defined three design principles for a synthetic genome as follows: first, it should result in a (near) wild-type phenotype and fitness; second, it should lack destabilizing elements such as tRNA genes or transposons; and third, it should have genetic flexibility to facilitate future studies. The synthetic genome features several systemic modifications complying with the design principles, including an inducible evolution system, SCRaMbLE (synthetic chromosome rearrangement and modification by loxP-mediated evolution). We show the utility of SCRaMbLE as a novel method of combinatorial mutagenesis, capable of generating complex genotypes and a broad variety of phenotypes. When complete, the fully synthetic genome will allow massive restructuring of the yeast genome, and may open the door to a new type of combinatorial genetics based entirely on variations in gene content and copy number.
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21918511      PMCID: PMC3774833          DOI: 10.1038/nature10403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  25 in total

1.  Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast.

Authors:  Anthony Admire; Lisa Shanks; Nicole Danzl; Mei Wang; Ulli Weier; William Stevens; Elizabeth Hunt; Ted Weinert
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli with phosphoserine.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Park; Michael J Hohn; Takuya Umehara; Li-Tao Guo; Edith M Osborne; Jack Benner; Christopher J Noren; Jesse Rinehart; Dieter Söll
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Precise manipulation of chromosomes in vivo enables genome-wide codon replacement.

Authors:  Farren J Isaacs; Peter A Carr; Harris H Wang; Marc J Lajoie; Bram Sterling; Laurens Kraal; Andrew C Tolonen; Tara A Gianoulis; Daniel B Goodman; Nikos B Reppas; Christopher J Emig; Duhee Bang; Samuel J Hwang; Michael C Jewett; Joseph M Jacobson; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Hotspots for unselected Ty1 transposition events on yeast chromosome III are near tRNA genes and LTR sequences.

Authors:  H Ji; D P Moore; M A Blomberg; L T Braiterman; D F Voytas; G Natsoulis; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-06-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Physical mapping of large DNA by chromosome fragmentation.

Authors:  D Vollrath; R W Davis; C Connelly; P Hieter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  D C Schwartz; C R Cantor
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Pairwise selection assembly for sequence-independent construction of long-length DNA.

Authors:  William J Blake; Brad A Chapman; Anuradha Zindal; Michael E Lee; Shaun M Lippow; Brian M Baynes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  GeneDesign: rapid, automated design of multikilobase synthetic genes.

Authors:  Sarah M Richardson; Sarah J Wheelan; Robert M Yarrington; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Purification and characterization of saccharopine dehydrogenase from baker's yeast.

Authors:  H Ogawa; M Fujioka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1978-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator.

Authors:  Jesse Stricker; Scott Cookson; Matthew R Bennett; William H Mather; Lev S Tsimring; Jeff Hasty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  133 in total

1.  Yeast 2.0.

Authors:  Tal Nawy
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Synthetic biology: a yeast for all reasons.

Authors:  Peter J Enyeart; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  "Poppy" yeast.

Authors:  Teresa Rinaldi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 4.  Chromatin regulation at the frontier of synthetic biology.

Authors:  Albert J Keung; J Keith Joung; Ahmad S Khalil; James J Collins
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Genome remodeling.

Authors:  Yizhi Cai; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Budding yeast for budding geneticists: a primer on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system.

Authors:  Andrea A Duina; Mary E Miller; Jill B Keeney
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  SCRaMbLE: A Study of Its Robustness and Challenges through Enhancement of Hygromycin B Resistance in a Semi-Synthetic Yeast.

Authors:  Jun Yang Ong; Reem Swidah; Marco Monti; Daniel Schindler; Junbiao Dai; Yizhi Cai
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 8.  Synthetic biology in mammalian cells: next generation research tools and therapeutics.

Authors:  Florian Lienert; Jason J Lohmueller; Abhishek Garg; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  Engineering reduced evolutionary potential for synthetic biology.

Authors:  Brian A Renda; Michael J Hammerling; Jeffrey E Barrick
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 10.  Molecular tools for chemical biotechnology.

Authors:  Stephanie Galanie; Michael S Siddiqui; Christina D Smolke
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 9.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.