Literature DB >> 29629781

The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Brett Bahle1, Valerie M Beck1, Andrew Hollingworth1.   

Abstract

In five experiments, we examined whether a task-irrelevant item in visual working memory (VWM) interacts with perceptual selection when VWM must also be used to maintain a template representation of a search target. This question is critical to distinguishing between competing theories specifying the architecture of interaction between VWM and attention. The single-item template hypothesis (SIT) posits that only a single item in VWM can be maintained in a state that interacts with attention. Thus, the secondary item should be inert with respect to attentional guidance. The multiple-item template hypothesis (MIT) posits that multiple items can be maintained in a state that interacts with attention; thus, both the target representation and the secondary item should be capable of guiding selection. This question has been addressed previously in attention capture studies, but the results have been ambiguous. Here, we modified these earlier paradigms to optimize sensitivity to capture. Capture by a distractor matching the secondary item in VWM was observed consistently across multiple types of search task (abstract arrays and natural scenes), multiple dependent measures (search reaction time (RT) and oculomotor capture), multiple memory dimensions (color and shape), and multiple search stimulus dimensions (color, shape, common objects), providing strong support for the MIT. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29629781      PMCID: PMC6037540          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  56 in total

1.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; G J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Setting up the target template in visual search.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Li-Wei King; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.

Authors:  R Houtkamp; P R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-color and multiple-color visual search.

Authors:  Anna Grubert; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Searching for two things at once: establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  13 in total

1.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Brett Bahle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.

Authors:  Yifan Wu; Yi Pan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Testing the underlying processes leading to learned distractor rejection: Learned oculomotor avoidance.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Daniel D Thayer; J Toby Mordkoff; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-10-07

8.  Visual working memory content influences correspondence processes.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Madeleine Y Stepper; Andrew Hollingworth; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates.

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.054

10.  Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Bao Zhang; Shuhui Liu; Mattia Doro; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.