Literature DB >> 35359229

The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.

Yifan Wu1, Yi Pan2.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the presence of a distractor object matching the current content of working memory interacts with visual search. Because finding a target and quitting a search without finding a target may be implemented by qualitatively different processes, it is possible that the effects of a memory-matching distractor on target-present trials and on target-absent trials reveal different mechanisms by which the memory-matching distractor interacts with visual search. Although previous studies have well established the effect of attentional capture by a memory-matching distractor when the target object is found in the search display, there remains an open question about whether the presence of a memory-matching distractor can affect the process of search termination when no target is found. In the present study, we showed that search termination times on target-absent trials were delayed by the presence of a distractor matching the content of visual working memory. This delayed quitting effect cannot be conceived of as a more general influence of visual short-term memory, because the presence of a distractor matching the content of passive visual short-term memory (i.e., visual priming) did not influence quitting behavior in visual search. These findings offer a novel perspective that distractors matching the information maintained in visual working memory can cause observers to delay search termination when no target has been found.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Search termination; Visual search; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35359229     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02477-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  36 in total

1.  MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Jamie I D Campbell; Valerie A Thompson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

2.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search.

Authors:  Mathias S Fleck; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-11

4.  The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-12-08

9.  Attentional templates in visual working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Jason T Arita; Deborah Pardo; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.