| Literature DB >> 32952433 |
Nancy B Carlisle1, Geoffrey F Woodman2.
Abstract
Various theoretical proposals have been put forward to explain how memory representations control attention during visual search. In this study, we use the first saccade on each trial as away to quantify the attentional impact of multiple types of representations held in working memory. Across two experiments, we found that a search target maintained in working memory was attended over 20 times more frequently than a non-memory-matching distractor. In addition, an item matching an additional object represented in working memory was attended 2 times more frequently than a non-memory matching distractor. These findings show that there is a measurable attentional impact of items maintained in working memory for a future task, however, such representations have a much weaker attentional impact than working memory representations of search targets.Entities:
Keywords: Eye Tracking; Visual Attention; Visual Search; Working Memory
Year: 2019 PMID: 32952433 PMCID: PMC7500442 DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vis cogn ISSN: 1350-6285