Literature DB >> 31589068

The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.

Brett Bahle1, Daniel D Thayer1, J Toby Mordkoff1, Andrew Hollingworth1.   

Abstract

Theories of working memory (WM) differ in their claims about the number of items that can be maintained in a state that directly interacts with other, ongoing cognitive operations (termed the focus of attention). A similar debate has arisen in the literature on visual working memory (VWM), focused on the number of items that can simultaneously interact with attentional priority. In 3 experiments, we used a redundancy-gain paradigm to provide a comprehensive test of the latter question. Participants searched for 2 cued features (e.g., a color and a shape) within a search array. The cued feature values changed on a trial-by-trial basis, requiring VWM. The target (when present) could match 1 of the cued features (single-target trials) or both cued features (redundant-target trials). We tested whether response time distributions contained a substantial proportion of trials with redundant-target responses that were faster than predicted by 2 independent guidance processes operating in parallel (i.e., violations of the race-model inequality). Violations are consistent with a coactive architecture in which both cued values guide attention in parallel and sum on the priority map. Robust violations were observed in all cases predicted by the hypothesis that multiple items in VWM can guide attention simultaneously, and these results were inconsistent with the hypothesis that guidance is limited to a single item simultaneously. When considered in the larger context of the literature on VWM and attention, the present results are consistent with a model of WM architecture in which the focus of attention can maintain multiple, independent representations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31589068      PMCID: PMC7136148          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  58 in total

1.  Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: parallel-coactive processing of dimensions is location specific.

Authors:  Joseph Krummenacher; Hermann J Müller; Dieter Heller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Using the dual-target cost to explore the nature of search target representations.

Authors:  Michael J Stroud; Tamaryn Menneer; Kyle R Cave; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Svetlana Bialkova
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-02

4.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

5.  Absence of coactivation in the motor component: evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; J Miller; A C Roch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Serial attention within working memory.

Authors:  H Garavan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

7.  Object selection costs in visual working memory: A diffusion model analysis of the focus of attention.

Authors:  David K Sewell; Simon D Lilburn; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Can the focus of attention accommodate multiple, separate items?

Authors:  Amanda L Gilchrist; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Location-Unbound Color-Shape Binding Representations in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Jun Saiki
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-12-28
View more
  6 in total

1.  Memory after visual search: Overlapping phonology, shared meaning, and bilingual experience influence what we remember.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Sayuri Hayakawa; Scott R Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Clayton E Curtis; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 4.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

5.  How Do Art Skills Influence Visual Search? - Eye Movements Analyzed With Hidden Markov Models.

Authors:  Miles Tallon; Mark W Greenlee; Ernst Wagner; Katrin Rakoczy; Ulrich Frick
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 6.  Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.

Authors:  Stanislas Huynh Cong; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.