Literature DB >> 32557006

Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Deborah A Cronin1, Candace E Peacock2,3, John M Henderson2,3.   

Abstract

Working memory is thought to be divided into distinct visual and verbal subsystems. Studies of visual working memory frequently use verbal working memory tasks as control conditions and/or use articulatory suppression to ensure that visual load is not transferred to verbal working memory. Using these verbal tasks relies on the assumption that the verbal working memory load will not interfere with the same processes as visual working memory. In the present study, participants maintained a visual or verbal working memory load as they simultaneously viewed scenes while their eye movements were recorded. Because eye movements and visual working memory are closely linked, we anticipated the visual load would interfere with scene-viewing (and vice versa), while the verbal load would not. Surprisingly, both visual and verbal memory loads interfered with scene-viewing behavior, while eye movements during scene-viewing did not significantly interfere with performance on either memory task. These results suggest that a verbal working memory load can interfere with eye movements in a visual task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Eye movements; Scene-viewing; Verbal working memory; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32557006      PMCID: PMC7387211          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02076-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

1.  Do mental processes share a domain-general resource?

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-04

2.  Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Richard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-02

4.  The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Michael L Mack; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

7.  Visual working memory supports perceptual stability across saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; David E Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  Distractibility is a function of engagement, not task difficulty: Evidence from a new oculomotor capture paradigm.

Authors:  Simona Buetti; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-10

10.  Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Michaël Stevens
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2018-01-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Do cognitive load and ADHD traits affect the tendency to prioritise social information in scenes?

Authors:  Astrid Priscilla Martinez-Cedillo; Kevin Dent; Tom Foulsham
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.138

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.